Ducking, diving and playing along”
Negotiating everyday heteroerotic subjectivity in the field
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12645676 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Memory Mphaphuli (0000-0002-0354-9002, Ghent University, autor de correspondencia), G Griffin (0000-0002-1236-4691, Uppsala University) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 20 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 34-48 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-08-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Qualitative Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1443-9883 • E-ISSN: 1448-0980 |
| Editorial | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrj-03-2019-0029 |
| OpenAlex | W2970435486 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 26 |
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the fieldwork dilemmas a young, female, heterosexual, indigenous South African researching everyday negotiations around heterosexuality within township families encountered in negotiating her own heteroerotic subjectivity within the field. Design/methodology/approach A heterosexuality studies approach is here combined with a critical feminist research methodological perspective. Findings The paper argues that researchers are often unprepared for having to negotiate their erotic subjectivity within the field and that such negotiations can be compromising to the researcher in a variety of ways. Practical implications The paper suggests that more might be done to prepare researchers for negotiating identity aspects such as sexuality in the field since that negotiation impacts on one’s research and the researcher’s sense of self in the field. Social implications The paper critically interrogates what negotiating one’s erotic subjectivity in the field might mean. Originality/value Little is published on female researchers negotiating their heteroerotic subjectivity in the field. The paper contributes original insights on this from fieldwork carried out by an indigenous heterosexual female researcher in South African townships. It raises important issues about the conduct of fieldwork in (non-)compromising and agentic ways
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Heterosexuality · Human sexuality · Identity (music · Indigenous · Negotiation · Originality · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Value (mathematics · Data Analysis and Archiving · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Situating Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork
Taboo
Ethnography
Heterosexual hierarchies
Flirting in the field
The Compromised Researcher
The field as a landscape of desire
Resisting the binarism of victim and agent
Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research
The Racialized Erotics of Participatory Research
A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate
Showing Roughness in a Beautiful Way
My Best Informant's Dress
Reflexivity Redux
Between marginality and privilege
Conducting community-engaged qualitative research in South Africa
Interviews as encounters
Sexual(ized) harassment and ethnographic fieldwork
The Masculine Self As Problem and Resource in Interview Studies of Men
Studying Each Other
One way or another
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |