Does the “big tent” include non-academics? Social media content creators conducting critical scholarship
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12645703 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicole Sankofa (0000-0002-6098-6882, University of North Texas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 427-444 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-20 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1443-9883 • E-ISSN: 1448-0980 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/qrj-01-2023-0008 |
| OpenAlex | W4366493968 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Purpose LeftTube – a loosely connected community of left-leaning content creators on YouTube – includes a subsection of video essayists that conduct scholarly work seemingly adjacent to critical research. Exploring this digital community of critical scholars may precipate opportunities for collaboration and reciprocal learning to better academic qualitative research approaches. Therefore, the purpose of this exploratory study is to (1) examine if and how this digital community engages in critical scholarship, and (2) initiate a call for academic qualitative scholars to watch this digital space as a potential source of collaboration, an opportunity for co-learning and consideration for inclusion in the qualitative “big tent”. Design/methodology/approach Using an algorithm-based sampling procedure, 143 videos were sampled across 23 Black women content creators. Videos were analyzed for characteristics of critical research using multimodal-ethnographic semiotic analysis. Findings Findings suggest that 11 strategies of critical scholarship were used with themes of knowledge production and ethical framework. Such results indicate that this subsection of LeftTube video essayists are conducting critical scholarship. Originality/value The most significant implication is the expansion of the qualitative “big tent” to include international social media content creators who conduct social science research. This would have many benefits to academic qualitative researchers, including learning how the studied community (1) makes critical scholarship impactful and influential in civil discourse, (2) mobilizes critical language, and (3) resists neoliberal and capitalist systems attempting to marginalize critical research
Critical theory · Engaged scholarship · Media studies · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Scholarship · Social media · Social science · Sociology · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Law · Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media · Social Media and Politics
Critical Qualitative Inquiry
Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects
What makes people share political content on social media? The role of emotion, authority and ideology
Teaching Qualitative Inquiry in the Era of the Big Tent
Studying social media as semiotic technology
The new paradigm dialogs and qualitative inquiry
The Theory of Methodology in Qualitative Research
Response to Tracy’s Under the “Big Tent
Politeness and psychological distance
Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
The elephant in the living room
Multimodal ethnography
Qualitative Quality
Building Confidence in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Inquiry, Ethics, and Politics of Evidence
| Highly cited | No |
|---|