Social Networks in Slovenia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12657921 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hlebec (0000-0002-3691-7959, University of Ljubljana, corresponding author), Valentina Hlebec (University of Ljubljana), Maša Filipovič Hrast (0000-0003-4816-1164, University of Ljubljana), Tina Kogovšek (0009-0001-4355-8608, University of Ljubljana) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 697-717 |
| Publication date | 2010-06-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Societies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-6696 • E-ISSN: 1469-8307 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14616696.2010.483009 |
| OpenAlex | W1516855369 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 34 |
The process generally referred to as ‘the transition’ implied a complex set of social changes in Central and Eastern European countries (CEE). On the one hand, there were institutional reforms which were launched to abolish the socialist economic and political systems. On the other hand, the provision of welfare was also affected by ‘transition’. The change could be observed at the institutional level (i.e., through the welfare state) as well as at the social and individual level – in the ways individuals associated, how they perceived new risks and with whom they engaged to confront them. In this article we focus on social support provision from informal sources, i.e., ego-centered social support networks, which are an important foundation for the quality of everyday life. We would like to find out whether changes in the socio-economic system are reflected in and accompanied by changes in social support providers. How have people responded to transition? Did the patterns of support and social support providers change in this period? Consequently, the research question addressed in this article is the following: do the current types of social networks differ from those in the 1980s? We try to answer it by analyzing and comparing the data on social support networks in 1987 and 2002. The data are interpreted in the context of the transition that was happening in Slovenia at the time
Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Politics · Social change · Social support · Social Welfare · Sociology · Transition (genetics · Welfare · Welfare state · Health disparities and outcomes · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks · Social Psychology · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Social structure and network analysis
Support systems and community mental health
Social Support and Psychological Well-Being
Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective
The Contribution of the Social Environment to Host Resistance1
Social Networks, Host Resistance, and Mortality
Work stress and social support
Measuring age as a structural concept
Delineating personal support networks
Personal networks and social support in a multiethnic community of southern California
Interpretation and interview context
Network items and the general social survey
Homogeneity in confiding relations
Social networks, marital status, and well-being
Social Support in the Context of Caregiving
Natural support systems and coping with major life changes
Support systems and community mental health
Social support networks and the crisis of bereavement
Variations in Social Support Associated with Gender, Ethnicity, and Age
A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data
Social Ties at the Neighborhood Level
Social Support as a Moderator of Life Stress
The meaning and measurement of social support
Netville Online and Offline
The Relationship between Social Support and Life Satisfaction as a Function of Family Structure
The Impact of Children upon Social Support Networks throughout the Life Course
Social Structures. A Network Approach
Social Support and Depressed Mood
The Strength of Weak Ties
Statistical Models for Social Support Networks
Different Strokes from Different Folks
The Community Question
The Strength of Weak Ties
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2020 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |