Audience Responses to Peace Journalism

Merging results from a four-country research study

Bibliographic Data

ID12658695
AuthorsAnnabel Mcgoldrick (Barrick Gold (Canada), corresponding author), Jake Lynch (0000-0002-3959-1974, Lynn University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume17
Issue5
Pages628-646
Publication date2014-12-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournalism Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-670X • E-ISSN: 1469-9699
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1461670x.2014.992621
OpenAlexW1526698955
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited25

This article shows how results were merged from a study conducted in four countries—Australia, the Philippines, South Africa and Mexico—in which differently versioned television news stories about conflict were played to audiences, and their responses gathered through a mix of methods, to yield both quantitative and qualitative results. These versions were coded according to the Peace Journalism model, a set of distinctions in the representation of conflict, originally conceived by Johan Galtung. A Peace Journalism bulletin and a War Journalism bulletin were produced in each country. Viewer responses—both emotional and cognitive—showed significant differences, depending on which version they watched. This article compares selected stories in each country, which had the strongest measured effects in the original study, and identifies common thematic elements. The most significant of these is that, in the Peace Journalism version of each of the selected stories bar one, viewers were provided with the personal narrative of a carefully chosen individual protagonist, which prompted both their empathy and, through that, their cognitive engagement with counter-hegemonic arguments in favour of non-violent conflict responses

Citizen journalism · Journalism · Media ethics · Media studies · Political science · Sociology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub