The Elective Affinity Between Elite Journalists and Mainstream Economists in Brazil

Bibliographic Data

ID12659366
AuthorsAntonio José Pedroso Neto (0000-0002-6509-527X, Postgraduate Program in Communication and Society, Federal University of Tocantins (Universidad federal de Tocantins), Brazil.), T Undurraga (0000-0003-4267-5826, Department of Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile and Research Associate, Department of Science and Technology Studies, University College London, UK, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume19
Issue15
Pages2243-2263
Publication date2017-06-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournalism Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-670X • E-ISSN: 1469-9699
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1461670x.2017.1334572
OpenAlexW2625298905
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited30

This article explores the ties between elite economic journalists and mainstream economists in Brazil. It does so by investigating the influence of mainstream economists on journalists’ careers, and therewith, on Brazil’s public discussion. Using mixed methods, we study the main achievements that help to explain economic journalists’ position. We present a multiple correspondence analysis of 53 economic journalists, 30 who are in elite positions and 23 who are from the same cohort but are not in elite positions. Elaborating on 58 interviews, we explore the field’s professional dynamic, examining the sources that produce scoops, how journalists formed their economic perspectives and how economic sources link to the press. We find that there are two elites of economic journalists in Brazil with different career paths. Although careers among elite journalists might diverge, there is a manifest elective affinity between them and financial elites. Key economic journalists reached elite positions by sharing the doxa of mainstream economists. Journalists who worked in the Central Bank, economic ministers or private banks tended to rise in their professional careers. The familiarity with key financial agents of non-elite journalists, by contrast, is more limited. The article concludes by discussing the implications of this elective affinity for the public sphere in Brazil

Economics · Elite · Mainstream · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Sociology · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Finance · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub