Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Re-imagining nonpunitive approaches and rehabilitation in the courtroom

The case of drug courts in Chile

Datos Bibliográficos

ID12664021
AutoresSebastián Galleguillo (0000-0001-5772-637X, University of Massachusetts Boston, autor de correspondencia), Sebastián Galleguillos (University of Massachusetts Boston, autor de correspondencia)
Año2026
Fecha de publicación2026-01-27
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPunishment & Society (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1462-4745 • E-ISSN: 1741-3095
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14624745261416744
OpenAlexW7125769080
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas37

The combination of punishment and treatment in drug courts to rehabilitate defendants reflects the expansion of coercive penal care in court settings. In the U.S, drug courts remain deeply controversial: whereas some scholars and policymakers advocate for their expansion based on recidivism and cost-benefit evaluations, others raise concerns regarding the use of legal coercion and punitive measures in therapeutic settings. In 2004, Chile became the first Latin American country to implement drug courts. Unlike the U.S. drug court model, drug courts in Chile are not allowed to impose jail sanctions on defendants, offering a more restricted setting to examine how treatment and penal supervision are merged. Using semi-structured interviews (N = 34), I explore how courtroom actors and case managers understand the core elements of drug courts and their potential punitive nature. The findings show that the implementation of drug courts by team members—embracing recovery beyond zero-abstinence goals and focusing on the defendant's voluntariness to remain in the program— reflects a more balanced form of coercive penal care. Importantly, team members recognize the potential net-widening effects associated with this drug court model. I conclude by discussing the need to reformulate the role of defendants’ agency and punitive measures in problem-solving courts

Agency (philosophy · Coercion (linguistics · Drug court · Prison · Punishment (psychology · Punitive damages · Recidivism · Sanctions · Voluntariness · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

  • Classification for Effective Rehabilitation

    Open Access•D A Andrews, James Bonta et al.•Criminal Justice and Behavior•1990

  • Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts

    Deborah Koetzle Shaffer•Justice Quarterly•2011

  • Reinforcing the abstinence ideal

    Carly Lightowlers•Drugs Education Prevention and…•2024

  • Examining Perceived Coercion in Drug Treatment Courts

    Open Access•Kathryn E Bruzios, Paige M Shaffer et al.•International Journal of Offender…•2023

  • Positive Growth and Redemption in Prison

    Lila Kazemian•Positive Growth and Redemption in…•2019

  • A Critical Analysis of Drug Courts in Chile

    Open Access•Silvio Cuneo Nash, Paula Medina González•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2022

  • Recovery and desistance

    David Best, Jamie Irving et al.•Addiction Research & Theory•2016

  • Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism

    Open Access•Ojmarrh Mitchell, Darryl Babe Wilson et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2012

  • Improving graduation rates in drug court

    Open Access•John R Gallagher, Anne Nordberg et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2016

  • The Impact of Drug Courts

    Open Access•John S Goldkamp•Criminology & Public Policy•2003

  • Shifting the practice of coercive penal care over time in a problem-solving court

    Open Access•Marisa Omori, Jeong-Gyeong Lee et al.•Punishment & Society•2023

  • Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject

    Open Access•Kelly Hannah‐moffat, Kelly Hannah-Moffat•Punishment & Society•2004

  • Making the criminal addict

    Open Access•Teresa Gowan, Sarah Whetstone•Punishment & Society•2012

  • Shifting and targeted forms of penal governance

    Open Access•Kelly Hannah‐moffat, Kelly Hannah-Moffat et al.•Theoretical Criminology•2012

  • Theorizing the role of the ‘war on drugs’ in US punishment

    Open Access•Mona Lynch•Theoretical Criminology•2012

  • Decision Making in a Hybrid Organization

    Open Access•Kimberly M Baker•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Tough Love

    Stacy Lee Burns, Mark Peyrot•Social Problems•2003

  • Translating Justice and Therapy

    Dawn Moore•The British Journal of Criminology•2007

  • Shifting Constellations of Actors and Their Influence on Policy Diffusion

    Open Access•James W Douglas, Ringa Raudla et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2015

  • The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation

    Tony Ward, Mark Brown•Psychology, Crime & Law•2004

  • Understanding Desistance from Crime

    John H Laub, Robert J Sampson•Crime and Justice•2001

  • Southern Criminology

    K Carrington, Russell Hogg et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2015

  • Doing Good with a Vengeance

    Open Access•Benedikt Fischer•Criminal Justice•2003

  • The Thorny Intersection Between Adult Drug Treatment Courts and Medical Marijuana Criminal Immunity Laws

    Open Access•Michael D Sousa•Sociological Inquiry•2025

  • Governing Marginality

    Open Access•Michelle S Phelps, Ebony L Ruhland et al.•Social Problems•2022

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae