Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A reality check on the digitalisation of prisons

Assessing the opportunities and risks of providing digital technologies for prisoners

Bibliographic Data

ID12664103
AuthorsVeronika Hofinger (0000-0002-9244-4455, Universität Innsbruck, corresponding author), Philipp Pflegerl (Universität Innsbruck)
Year2024
Volume26
Issue5
Pages898-916
Publication date2024-03-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePunishment & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-4745 • E-ISSN: 1741-3095
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14624745241237190
OpenAlexW4392921373
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited26

While our societies are developing into digital information societies, most prisoners do not have access to modern information and communications technologies. Smart prisons that provide digital devices for prisoners aim to grant prisoners more autonomy, provide access to education and information, strengthen contact with relatives and friends and reduce the effects of deprivation. The concept of ‘digital rehabilitation’ suggests that digital devices have a positive effect on rehabilitation in various areas. Nonetheless, technological developments also entail risks that go beyond security concerns such as misuse of the devices by prisoners. Based on qualitative interviews with Austrian prisoners and theoretical reflections on the opportunities and risks of digital technologies in prison, we point out ambivalences and possible negative effects for prisoners that have received little attention so far. We outline the importance of a needs-oriented implementation in order to avoid negative outcomes such as a mere expansion of surveillance, an outsourcing of institutional responsibility, a loss of important social interactions and a deepening of the digital divide within the institution. In this paper, we further contend that the selective digital transformation of prisons can function as a ‘Potemkin façade’ enabling prisons to present themselves as modern without structurally improving the conditions of the majority of the prison population. These risks, which might be less obvious than security concerns, must be taken into account when evaluating and implementing digitalisation strategies

Business · Criminology · Internet privacy · Political science · Prison · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Law

  • AI-based behaviour analysis in prisons

    Open Access•Robert Rothmann, Elisabeth Mayer•European Journal of Criminology•2026

  • Digital Divide Among Adults Under Community Supervision

    Open Access•Victoria D Ojeda, Spencer Chau et al.•Corrections•2026

  • Digital inclusion as a pathway to social reintegration of juvenile and convicted offenders

    Open Access•Eugenia Zivanai, Sibusisiwe Dube et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2026

  • ‘The behind-the-scenes we were never supposed to see’

    Open Access•Annika Pinch•Convergence The International…•2026

  • The use of online tools and Internet access in prisons

    Pablo Romero-Seseña, Alba Marsol-Gutiérrez et al.•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2025

  • Experiencing the digitalized prison

    Open Access•Kristel Beyens, Ione Geerts•Punishment & Society•2025

  • Prison Nation

    Paul Wright, Tara Herivel•Prison Nation•2013

  • Foucault and Political Reason

    Andrew Barry, Nikolas Rose et al.•Foucault and Political Reason•2013

  • Digital prison rehabilitation and successful re-entry into a digital society

    Open Access•Eugenia Zivanai, Gilbert Mahlangu•Cogent Social Sciences•2022

  • (B)Locked sites

    Bianca C Reisdorf, Y Jewkes•Information Communication & Society•2016

  • Soft power in prison

    Open Access•Ben Crewe•European Journal of Criminology•2011

  • A brave new world

    Open Access•Y Jewkes, Bianca C Reisdorf•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2016

  • Late-modern rehabilitation

    Open Access•Gwen Robinson•Punishment & Society•2008

  • Depth, weight, tightness

    Open Access•Ben Crewe•Punishment & Society•2011

  • Doing time, the smart way? Temporalities of the smart prison

    Open Access•Anne Kaun, Fredrik Stiernstedt•New Media & Society•2020

  • Incarceration & social inequality

    Open Access•B Western, Becky Pettit•Daedalus•2010

  • The Society of Captives

    Bruce Western, Gresham M Sykes•Society of Captives•2007

  • Government and Control

    Nikolas Rose•The British Journal of Criminology•2000

  • The Limits of the Sovereign State

    D GARLAND, Diana S Richmond Garland•The British Journal of Criminology•1996

  • Governmentality' and the Problem of Crime

    Open Access•David Garland•Theoretical Criminology•1997

  • Digital Rehabilitation

    Open Access•Bianca C Reisdorf, R V Rikard•American Behavioral Scientist•2018

  • Asylums

    Erving Goffman, David Dutton et al.•Asylums•2017

Citations per year6
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae