Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consequences of Truth-in-Sentencing

The Mississippi Case

Bibliographic Data

ID12664458
AuthorsPeter B Wood (Mississippi State University, corresponding author), R Gregory Dunaway (Mississippi State University)
Year2003
Volume5
Issue2
Pages139-154
Publication date2003-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePunishment & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1462-4745 • E-ISSN: 1741-3095
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/146247450352001
OpenAlexW2000964691
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited1

Like many other states, in the mid-1990s Mississippi responded to growing public fear of crime and mounting dissatisfaction with its criminal justice system by implementing a series of ‘get tough’ measures designed to control crime. Perhaps the primary vehicle for reform has been the enactment of ‘truth-in sentencing’ legislation. Truth-in-sentencing (TIS) does not imply a specific correctional policy, but covers a variety of reforms designed to improve the delivery of proportionate punishments and promote stability and predictability in administering criminal justice. In 1995 Mississippi implemented a TIS law which mandated that felons sentenced to prison must serve at least 85 percent of their sentence. Mississippi’s TIS law is unique compared to those passed in other states in that the 85 percent requirement applies to all groups of offenders, including non-violent offenders. The comprehensive nature of Mississippi’s TIS law has had a dramatic impact on the state’s criminal justice system - particularly its correctional component. This article examines both the direct effect of TIS on correctional populations, as well as the unanticipated impact of TIS on patterns of judicial decision making and political and economic dynamics related to prison construction in rural counties

Criminal justice · Criminal law · Criminology · Economic Justice · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Prison · Sociology · State (computer science · Variety (cybernetics · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Criminal Law and Evidence · Education Discipline and Inequality · Law · Law, Rights, and Freedoms · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Psychology

  • Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice

    D A Andrews, James Bonta•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2010

  • The Mississippi model

    Open Access•Sarah D Cate•Punishment & Society•2021

  • The impact of state sentencing policies on the U.S. prison population

    Open Access•Yan Zhang, Zhang Yan et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2009

  • Globalization and Prison Privatization

    Open Access•Phillip J Wood•International Political Sociology•2007

  • Punishment and DemocracyThree Strikes and You're Out in California

    Franklin E Zimring, Gordon Hawkins et al.•Punishment and Democracy•2003

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,21
Citation span2007 - 2021 (15)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae