Biodiversity monitoring as data practices
Moving beyond actor-centric science-policy interfaces
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12665696 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arne Langlet (0000-0003-4193-6385), Arne Langlet-Uranüs (University of Vienna), Felix Wurm (0009-0001-4405-7370, University of Vienna), Alice B M Vadrot (0000-0002-6043-9846, University of Vienna, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 177 |
| Pages | 104315-104315 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104315 |
| OpenAlex | W7127369520 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 55 |
The uptake of biodiversity monitoring data for policy and decision-making has remained limited. While several studies and initiatives address the gap between science and policy-making, biodiversity monitoring frameworks such as the CBD’s Global Biodiversity Framework increasingly expect biodiversity monitoring data to directly inform reporting and subsequently decision-making frameworks. Most studies and initiatives approach this interface assuming predefined actor groups (e.g. scientists and policymakers). At the same time, a lack of knowledge persists on the actual data practices of the individuals involved in biodiversity-related monitoring, reporting and policy-making from local observation sites to research institutions, repositories and national or regional decision-making bodies. This study examines these practices by employing a latent class analysis using data from an online survey within the biodiversity monitoring community. The analysis examines shared and divergent data practices and tests whether respondents’ affiliations explain their data practices. It highlights the added value of a person- and practice-centric approach in comparison to an actor- or affiliation-centric analysis by demonstrating that certain practices transcend actor groups while also revealing differences. These findings advance the discourse on science-policy interfaces in biodiversity monitoring and environmental governance more broadly, arguing for understanding the biodiversity monitoring science-policy interface as a data-to-policy interface in which a community of individuals from different actor groups converge around and build common data practices rather than a bilateral bridging between two actor groups. • A latent class analysis using survey data reveals three distinct biodiversity data practice profiles. • Data practices are not determined by institutional affiliation but by individual engagement patterns. • The "actor-centric" science-policy gap can be reframed as a "practice-centric" data-policy interface. • All classes report similar challenges but differ in the use of essential variables and international repositories. • Understanding shared data practices can enhance GBF reporting
Biodiversity · Bridging (networking · Citizen science · Corporate governance · Global biodiversity · Interface (matter · Latent class model · Survey data collection · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education · Species Distribution and Climate Change
New roles of science in society
Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making
Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management
Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources
Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations
Latent Class Analysis for Developmental Research
Boundary work for sustainable development
Ecological indicators
The Fair Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship
Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis.
Scientific evidence and public policy
A research agenda for the science of actionable knowledge
Effective Biodiversity Monitoring Needs a Culture of Integration
The Ipbes Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people
Technological advances in biodiversity monitoring
Data Literacy for Public Policymaking – Lessons from Covid-19 Crisis in India
Latent Class Analysis
The awkward question
Monitoring biodiversity mainstreaming in development cooperation post-2020
Knowledge brokering at the environmental science-policy interface — examining structure and activity
Knowledge exchange through an intermediary organization
Policy windows for the environment
Biodiversity Datadiversity
What do policy-makers do with scientific uncertainty? The incremental character of Swedish climate change policy-making
A rationale for science–policy interfaces
Latent Class Analysis
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |