Independent data for transparent monitoring of greenhouse gas emissions from the land use sector – What do stakeholders think and need
Bibliographic Data
The agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sectors contribute substantially to the net global anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To reduce these emissions under the Paris Agreement, effective mitigation actions are needed that require engagement of multiple stakeholders. Emission reduction also requires that accurate, consistent and comparable datasets are available for transparent reference and progress monitoring. Availability of free and open datasets and portals (referred to as independent data) increases, offering opportunities for improving and reconciling estimates of GHG emissions and mitigation options. Through an online survey, we investigated stakeholders’ data needs for estimating forest area and change, forest biomass and emission factors, and AFOLU GHG emissions. The survey was completed by 359 respondents from governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations, research institutes and universities, and public and private companies. These can be grouped into data users and data providers. Our results show that current open and freely available datasets and portals are only able to fulfil stakeholder needs to a certain degree. Users require a) detailed documentation regarding the scope and usability of the data, b) comparability between alternative data sources, c) uncertainty estimates for evaluating mitigation options, d) more region-specific and detailed data with higher accuracy for sub-national application, e) regular updates and continuity for establishing consistent time series. These requirements are found to be key elements for increasing overall transparency of data sources, definitions, methodologies and assumptions, which is required under the Paris Agreement. Raising awareness and improving data availability through centralized platforms are important for increasing engagement of data users. In countries with low capacities, independent data can support countries’ mitigation planning and implementation, and related GHG reporting. However, there is a strong need for further guidance and capacity development (i.e. ‘readiness support’) on how to make proper use of independent datasets. Continued investments will be needed to sustain programmes and keep improving datasets to serve the objectives of the many stakeholders involved in climate change mitigation and should focus on increased accessibility and transparency of data to encourage stakeholder involvement
Business · Comparability · Documentation · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental resource management · Greenhouse gas · Political science · Scope (computer science · Stakeholder · Stakeholder engagement · Survey data collection · Transparency (behavior · Usability · Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Fire effects on ecosystems · Species Distribution and Climate Change
Ten Strategies to Promote Climate Resilience and Sustainability of Global Forests
Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement
Data and information in a political forest
Is the Paris Agreement effective? A systematic map of the evidence
Critical method needs in measuring greenhouse gas fluxes
Satellite-based global maps are rarely used in forest reference levels submitted to the UNFCCC
Harnessing market mechanisms for greenhouse gas reduction
Challenges in delivering climate change policy through land use targets for afforestation and peatland restoration
Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change
Challenges in using land use and land cover data for global change studies
Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Aboveground carbon loss in natural and managed tropical forests from 2000 to 2012
Highlighting continued uncertainty in global land cover maps for the user community
Envisioning Redd + in a post‐Paris era
Assessing capacities of non-Annex I countries for national forest monitoring in the context of Redd
Exploring different forest definitions and their impact on developing Redd+ reference emission levels
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |