Actors mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities
A case study of Melbourne’s change agents and pathways for urban sustainability transformations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12668566 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Clare Adams (0000-0001-8318-7664, Swinburne University of Technology, corresponding author), Niki Frantzeskaki (0000-0002-6983-448X, Utrecht University), Magnus Moglia (0000-0002-8290-610X, Swinburne University of Technology) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 155 |
| Pages | 103723-103723 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103723 |
| OpenAlex | W4392878436 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 51 |
Nature-based solutions (NBS) are implemented across multiple cities worldwide and feature as promising solutions in local and global agendas. As solutions that can deal with interlinked urban challenges, NBS are being taken up by cities in different geographies and are considered to be mainstreaming. The process, referred to as mainstreaming, and how this can be achieved needs to be better understood, which is identified as a research gap. In this paper, we examine the roles that actors can undertake that contribute to the mainstreaming of NBS in cities. The aim is to understand the roles that urban actors, especially those within local governments, assume in the process of NBS mainstreaming to mobilise and implement novel and innovative strategic solutions for cities. This topic is explored in a case study of the metropolitan Melbourne region in Australia, where urban forest strategies are gaining traction in local governments for addressing urban resilience concerns. We present how the roles different actors assume contribute to the (re)shaping, building, and/or transformation of institutions to attain climate and ecologically resilient cities. The main contribution of this paper is a pathways framework that illustrates how sustainability norms can move through the mainstreaming process, facilitated by the roles that actors undertake – to champion, advocate, and realise transformative discourses and actions within urban politics and urban practices. Our key findings are framed as success factors of mainstreaming agencies and pathways underpinning transformation, which are: commitment longevity, innovative capacity, collaborative mindset, and on-ground delivery
Civil engineering · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Mainstreaming · Political science · Regional science · Sustainability · Urban planning · Urban Sustainability · Engineering · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Green Space and Health · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Innovative urban forestry governance in Melbourne?
Nature-Based Solutions for Urban Climate Change Adaptation
Key Enablers of and Barriers to the Uptake and Implementation of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Settings
Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions
Sustainability Transitions Research
Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions
Case Study Research
The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions
Transformative or piecemeal? Changes in green space planning and governance in eleven European cities
From the Frankfurt greenbelt to the Regionalpark RheinMain
What’s behind the barriers? Uncovering structural conditions working against urban nature-based solutions
A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis
Size matters
What Future for Green Infrastructure Planning? Evaluating the Changing Environment for Green Infrastructure Planning Following the Revocation of Regional Planning Policy in England
Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities
Upscaling climate change adaptation in small- and medium-sized municipalities
Nature-based solutions for urban biodiversity governance
Mainstreaming sustainable innovation
Regional scale integrated land use planning to meet multiple objectives
A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas
Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities
Transformative change and policy-making
Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions
Catalyzing sustainability pathways
Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities
Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions
Structural conditions for the wider uptake of urban nature-based solutions – A conceptual framework
Principles for urban nature-based solutions
Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere
Scaling-up nature-based solutions. Lessons from the Living Melbourne strategy
Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas
Agency in action
Actor roles in transition
Strategic Spatial Planning and the Ecosystem Services Concept - an Historical Exploration
Rethinking Sustainable Cities
Qualitative Data Analysis Software Practices in Complex Research Teams
Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |