Operationalizing social safeguards in Redd
Actors, interests and ideas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12669194 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Constance L Mcdermott (0000-0002-5238-0936, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Lauren Coad (0000-0001-8306-615X, University of Oxford), Ariella Helfgott (0000-0002-3987-6304, University of Oxford), Heike Schroeder (0000-0003-2342-2030, University of East Anglia) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 63-72 |
| Publication date | 2012-05-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Science & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1462-9011 • E-ISSN: 1873-6416 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.02.007 |
| OpenAlex | W2068647133 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 71 |
| References cited | 9 |
Business · Carbon stock · Climate change · Economics · Environmental resource management · Greenhouse gas · Kyoto Protocol · Operationalization · Political science · Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation · Safeguard · United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · French Urban and Social Studies · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Do No Harm, Do Markets Care? Evidence on Safeguard Provision and Credit Retirement in Voluntary Carbon Markets
Balancing carrots and sticks in Redd
The Redd+ policy arena in Vietnam
Identifying and categorizing cobenefits in state-supported Australian indigenous environmental management programs
Safeguarding what and for whom? The role of institutional fit in shaping Redd+ in Mexico
Evaluating Safeguards in a Conservation Incentive Program
Redd+ for the poor or the poor for Redd+? About the limitations of environmental policies in the Amazon and the potential of achieving environmental goals through pro-poor policies
Indigenous Peoples in UN Redd+ Negotiations
Equity and Redd+ in the Media
Beyond Carbon
Climate Change and Poverty—An Analytical Framework
Non-carbon benefits as incentives for participation in Redd + and the role of village participatory land use plans in supporting this
Explaining “Carbon” in Community Sequestration Projects
The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology
Institutionalizing Redd+ safeguards in Ghana
Flegt
Certification and equity
Using publicly available social and spatial data to evaluate progress on Redd+ social safeguards in Indonesia
Redduced
Performative politics of Redd+ experts
Examining equity
The legitimacy of incentive-based conservation and a critical account of social safeguards
Barriers to equity in Redd
Which “fairness”, for whom, and why? An empirical analysis of plural notions of fairness in Fairtrade Carbon Projects, using Q methodology
Policies affecting the implementation of Redd+ in Indonesia (cases in Papua, Riau and Central Kalimantan)
Distributional risk in PES
The parallel materialization of Redd+ implementation discourses in Brazil
Redd + research
Bridging knowledge divides
FLEGT VPAs
Synergies among social safeguards in FLEGT and Redd + in Cameroon
Policy for pro-poor distribution of Redd+ benefits in Mexico
Competing discourses on Redd
Implementing Redd+ at the national level
A Collaborative Forest Management user group's perceptions and expectations on Redd + in Nepal
Farmer perceptions of Redd+ livelihood interventions as incentive mechanism for reducing deforestation in the Juabuso-Bia cocoa forest landscape
Safeguards and Dangerguards
From Redd+ forests to green landscapes? Analyzing the emerging integrated landscape approach discourse in the UNFCCC
Promising start, bleak outlook
Social learning through a Redd + ‘village agreement’
Governing carbon, transforming forest politics
Can Redd+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar
Negotiating Indigenous benefits from payment for ecosystem service (PES) schemes
Policy learning in Redd+ Donor Countries
Centralization in the global avoided deforestation collaboration network
Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia
Transnational Legal Process and Discourse in Environmental Governance
Practice-Based Knowledge for Redd+ in Vanuatu
Seeing like a smartphone
Deliberative engagement and Redd+ in Indonesia
Uncertainty in Estimates, Incentives, and Emission Reductions in Redd+ Projects
Exploring Institutional Factors Influencing Equity in Two Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes
Contesting Justice in Global Forest Governance
The transnational policy process for Redd+ and domestic policy entrepreneurship in developing countries
Principles to gain a social licence to operate for green initiatives and biodiversity projects
Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards
Multilevel governance challenges in transitioning towards a national approach for Redd
Envisioning Redd + in a post‐Paris era
Adapting forest certification to climate change
Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance
Legitimacy in Redd+ governance in Indonesia
Building the Forest-Climate Bandwagon
Making Redd+ Transparent
Institutions and Policies to Protect Rural Livelihoods in Redd+ Regimes
How does ‘Free, Prior and Informed Consent’ (FPIC) impact social equity? Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for Redd
Environmental justice and Redd+ safeguards in Laos
Savoirs tactiques et expertises
What room for politics and change in global climate governance? Addressing gender in co-benefits and safeguards
The invisible commodity
Payments for Ecosystem Services in Sustainable Mangrove Forest Management in Bangladesh
What Difference Does CBDR Make? A Socio-Legal Analysis of the Role of Differentiation in the Transnational Legal Process for Redd
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities
Building the Forest-Climate Bandwagon
Institutions and Policies to Protect Rural Livelihoods in Redd+ Regimes
Seeing Redd+ as a project of environmental governance
Governing and implementing Redd
Redd-plus, forest people's rights and nested climate governance
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
| Unique citing works | 71 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4.44 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 61 |