Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Comparison of the Postal Telegraph Movement in Great Britain and the United States, 1866–1900

Bibliographic Data

ID12681614
AuthorsDavid Hochfelder (0000-0003-4129-9363, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author)
Year2000
Volume1
Issue4
Pages739-761
Publication date2000-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnterprise & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1467-2227 • E-ISSN: 1467-2235
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/es/1.4.739
OpenAlexW2122390233
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited17

This article places the British and American postal telegraph movements in the broader context of a transatlantic reform tradition. More specifically, British nationalization in 1870 gave American reformers both a rallying point and a rationale for postalizing the telegraphs. The legacies of both movements were mixed. In Britain, the postal telegraph provided inexpensive and accessible service, but it soon ran a large deficit and retarded the development of the telephone industry. In the United States, reformers failed to nationalize the telegraph or to secure a place in historical memory, but they succeeded in pressuring Western Union to provide better service, and they provided the impetus for the municipal ownership movement of the Progressive Era

Context (archaeology · Economic history · Economics · Economy · Movement (music · Political economy · Political science · Postal service · Service (business · Sociology · Scottish History and National Identity · History · Law · Public Administration

  • AT&T's Antigovernment Lesson-Drawing in the Political Economy of Networks, 1905-20

    Richard B Kielbowicz•History of Political Economy•2009

  • Failed Transmissions and Broken Hearts

    Brenton J Malin•Media History•2011

  • New Media

    Roger Barton, Roger Neil Barton•Media History•2010

  • The dematerialization of telecommunication

    Open Access•Roland Wenzlhuemer•Journal of Global History•2007

  • The Structure of the News Market in Britain, 1870–1914

    Open Access•Jonathan Silberstein-Loeb, Jonathan Silberstein‐Loeb•The Business History Review•2009

  • Constructing an Industrial Divide

    Open Access•David Hochfelder•The Business History Review•2002

  • British business and the telephone, 1878–1911

    Graeme J Milne•Business History•2007

  • Principles of political economy

    John Stuart Mill•Principles of political economy•1898

  • An introduction to political economy

    Richard Theodore Ely•An introduction to political…•1889

  • Building a New American State

    Open Access•Stephen Skowronek•Building a New American State•1982

  • Affairs of State

    Morton Keller•Affairs of State•1977

  • Spreading the news

    Richard R John•Spreading the news•1998

  • Atlantic Crossings

    Daniel T Rodgers, Uta G Poiger•The SHAFR Guide Online•2017

  • State Intervention in Mid-Nineteenth Century Britain

    Open Access•P W J Bartrip•Journal of British Studies•1983

  • Monopolies and Trusts

    F C Montague, Richard T Ely•The Economic Journal•1900

  • Atlantic Crossings

    Daniel T Rodgers•Atlantic Crossings•1998

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0.29
Citation span2002 - 2011 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae