Kind of like making porn of yourself”
Understanding sexting through pornography
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12690487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rikke Amundsen (0000-0002-4841-6684, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 479-494 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Media Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-0777 • E-ISSN: 1471-5902 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14680777.2018.1494617 |
| OpenAlex | W2894745464 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 21 |
This article contributes to the existing literature on sexting and the “sexualisation of culture” by examining how women make sense of their sexting practices by thinking through pornography frames. In doing so, it draws on interview material collected for a study on adult women’s experiences of using digital technology in their romantic and/or sexual relationships. To the women in this study, their private sexual images—as created for the purpose of sexting—were acts of communication that could be both not-pornography and pornography depending on the private and/or public contexts in which they were shared and consumed. They did not distinguish between sexting and pornography based on the content of the images, but based on where they occur and who consumes them. Indeed, they argued that the same private sexual image could take on different meanings, as the predominant conventions within the given context of display and consumption guide the audience’s interpretation. A key argument put forward in this article is thus that, in aiming to understand complex social phenomena like sexting and pornography, we should look to how different types of sexual representations gain meaning within particular contexts as marked by certain conventions
Argument (complex analysis · Child pornography · Consumption (sociology · Context (archaeology · Human sexuality · Interpretation (philosophy · Meaning (existential · Pornography · Social science · Sociology · The Internet · Computer Science · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology · Social Psychology
Reconnecting Pornography, Prostitution, and Trafficking
Online daters’ sexually explicit media consumption and imagined interactions
The Impact of Autonomous and Controlled Sexting Motivations on Subjective Well-being and Relationship Quality
Educational Perspectives on Mediality and Subjectivation
The currency of images
The turn to trust
A male dominance kind of vibe’
Hetero-sexting as mediated intimacy work
Sexualized, platformed female bodies in male online practices
Tailored pornography
Gendered meanings and mechanisms of intimacy for people living with chronic pain
Sex on screens
Individual and Cross-Cultural Predictors of Sexting Among Adults from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia
In my village everything is known”
Re-faced and Pornified— A Visual, Narrative Analysis of Sexual Scripts in Police Cases of Image-based Abuse
Sexting for the Right Reasons
Coming out - seducing - flirting
Striptease Culture
Sexting Panic
Are You Sexy, Flirty, Or A Slut? Exploring ‘Sexualization’ and How Teen Girls Perform/Negotiate Digital Sexual Identity on Social Networking Sites
Spicing It Up
Sext education
Bodies, Technologies, Spaces
Intimacy and/or degradation
Revenge Porn and Mental Health
Sexting as media production
Postfeminist media culture
What do people do with porn? Qualitative research into the comsumption, use, and experience of pornography and other sexually explicit media
Sexting, consent and young people's ethics
Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation
Empowerment/Sexism
Post-postfeminism
Trading Sexpics on IRC
Protecting Respondent Confidentiality in Qualitative Research
Teen girls, sexual double standards and 'sexting
The Naked Self
Pornography, Women and Feminism
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |