Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conceptual anatomy of the female genitalia using text mining and implications for patient care

Bibliographic Data

ID12692017
AuthorsCarmen Thong (0000-0002-4576-1415, English, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA, corresponding author), Alexis Doyle (0000-0003-4856-6962, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA)
Year2023
Volume50
Issue1
Pages86-94
Publication date2023-12-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Humanities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1468-215X • E-ISSN: 1473-4265
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/medhum-2023-012747
PMID38164575
OpenAlexW4390225285
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited18

This article analyses the conceptual histories of words associated with female genital parts to explore how they may affect the lived experience of people with these parts and the quality of gynaecological care they receive. Specifically, we examine the implications of using the word 'vagina' to replace the word 'vulva', or indeed to indicate the entire female genitalia. This article does so through an analysis of existing scholarly work and through text mining methods such as word frequencies, most distinctive word collocates and word-embeddings drawn from literary and women's magazine corpora. We find that words indicating specific female genital parts are very infrequently mentioned in our corpora, which shows that there is a troubling lack of exposure and education in our socio-cultural context when it comes to the female genital anatomy. When they are mentioned, their usage reflects historical and patriarchal associations that have been primarily attached to the word 'vagina'. When it comes to the 'vagina' and 'vulva', the penis is the most prevalent association by far; whereas the most commonly occurring female genital parts are parts to do with reproduction-reinforcing a long-standing and disproportionate emphasis on the female genitalia's reproductive function. Our research also reveals a concerning emphasis on non-evidence-based female hygiene products, thus perpetuating the damaging stereotype of the dirty vagina. These findings may explain many negative patient outcomes such as stigma attached to seeking out timely gynaecological care, lack of informed medical consent and non-evidence-based practices exacerbated by problematic cultural depictions of the female genitalia. They can also explain the neglect of female sexual agency, pleasure and well-being. Understanding historical and contemporary usages of words for the female genitalia has important implications for the quality of patient care today and is a critical component of gender and reproductive justice

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues · Medicine · Psychology · Anatomy

  • “It’s About Building Up an Intense Arousal That Eventually Explodes”

    Open Access•Jessica Påfs, Karin Törnbom et al.•International Journal of Sexual…•2026

  • Vagina, Pussy, Vulva, Vag

    Open Access•Tanja Oschatz, Viola Klein et al.•Sex Roles•2025

  • Socio-cultural representations of the vagina

    Braun, V Braun et al.•Journal of Reproductive and…•2001

  • Differences in Orgasm Frequency Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Men and Women in a U.S. National Sample

    Open Access•David A Frederick, H Kate St John et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2018

  • Aristotle and woman

    Open Access•MaryAnneCline Horowitz•Journal of the History of Biology•1976

  • The Clitoris

    Mark J Blechner•Studies in Gender and Sexuality•2017

  • And What Do Little Girls Have

    Harriet Goldhor Lerner•Agenda•1994

  • Public Talk about ‘Private Parts’

    Open Access•Braun•Feminism & Psychology•1999

  • Dangers of the vagina

    Open Access•Benjamin Beit‐hallahmi•British Journal of Medical…•1985

  • Telling it straight? Dictionary definitions of women's genitals

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2001

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae