Soviet policy in the developing world and the Chinese challenge in the 1960s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12695484 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jeremy Friedman (a LSE Cold War Conference, April 24, 2009, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 247-272 |
| Publication date | 2010-05-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cold War History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-2745 • E-ISSN: 1743-7962 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14682745.2010.481426 |
| OpenAlex | W1974100998 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
The Editors of the journal Cold War History have the pleasure to present this paper as the winner of the Best Paper Award at the last Graduate Conference on the Cold War, jointly organised every year by the University of California, Santa Barbara, the George Washington University, Washington DC, and the London School of Economics and Political Science, London. It is not often that a paper, as was the case with this one, won unanimous endorsement from prominent Cold War scholars from all three institutions, present at the Conference. The last Conference was organised in April 2009, at LSE, in London and the host of the next one to be held on 22–24 April 2010 will be the George Washington University. By continuing with the practice we inaugurated last year, we wish to underline our commitment to promoting and encouraging new and substantive research of the Cold War by young scholars. As the colonial system collapsed quicker than anticipated in the post-Second World War period, the Soviet Union found itself unprepared, and it hurriedly tried to build the institutions necessary to conduct an active foreign, economic and military policy in the newly emerging states. The development of the Sino–Soviet split triggered a Chinese challenge to this Soviet push for influence, with Beijing portraying the USSR as another white, imperialist power that valued relations with the West over the cause of national liberation. Moscow was consequently forced to adapt its policy, particularly by taking a more militant approach, in order to neutralise the Chinese threat
Beijing · China · Cold war · Economic history · Foreign policy · George (robot · Militant · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Communism, Protests, Social Movements · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Law · Public Administration · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Cold War Liberation
Mediators of Liberation
What was the Cold War
Indigenous Peoples and Imperialism
Indigenous Peoples and Imperialism
Cold War Liberation
Banking on Military Assistance
Special issue introduction
Semi-peripheral countries and the invention of the ‘Third World’, 1955–65
The Uses of Foreigners in Mao-Era China
The provocation of empirical evidence
| Citations per year | 0.79 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2022 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |