Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Negotiating a unified Atlantic naval command

Anglo-American summit talks and the impact of domestic politics

Bibliographic Data

ID12698087
AuthorsSteve Marsh (Cardiff University, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume14
Issue2
Pages95-109
Publication date2012-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal for Maritime Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1469-1957 • E-ISSN: 2153-3369
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/21533369.2012.726426
OpenAlexW2005622399
LanguageEN
References cited2

From Trafalgar in 1805 to the Battle of Jutland in 1916, the Royal Navy was in its prime. It symbolised Britain's early industrialisation, safeguarded British trade, protected strategically vital sea lanes around the British Isles and the empire, and projected British power to far-flung corners of the world. Despite British acceptance of naval parity with the United States under the terms of the Five-Power Naval Limitation Treaty signed in Washington in 1922 (and the gradual establishment of the US Navy as the world's most powerful and important naval force), within Britain the Royal Navy remained highly respected and was popularly seen as a yardstick of British greatness. When plans for a unified Supreme Allied Atlantic Naval Command (SACLANT) under an American admiral were leaked in February 1951, furious British popular and political protest ensued. The plans appeared to be a slight upon the Royal Navy, an affront to Britain's status and maritime history, and a damaging reflection of the state of the Anglo-American relationship. The Attlee government was pilloried for accepting SACLANT in principle and, once restored to power in October 1951, Churchill pledged to seek alternative arrangements with President Truman. This article casts new light upon the consequent negotiations about the Atlantic Command at an Anglo-American summit meeting in January 1952. Specifically, it argues that understanding the conduct of these talks and ultimate British acquiescence requires careful consideration of domestic political considerations in Britain and the United States – an explanatory factor hitherto missed in the (surprisingly few) existing analyses of the SACLANT issue

Ancient history · Battle · Economic history · Navy · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Treaty · History · Law · Maritime Security and History

  • Churchill at the Summit

    Alan P Dobson, Steve Marsh•The International History Review•2010

  • The Gallup Poll and the 1950 Election

    George Gallup•Public Opinion Quarterly•1951

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae