Explaining the security paradigm shift
Strategic culture, epistemic communities, and Israel’s changing national security policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12699340 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tamir Libel (0000-0002-5141-7418, Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 137-156 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Defence Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1470-2436 • E-ISSN: 1743-9698 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14702436.2016.1165595 |
| OpenAlex | W2317694881 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 31 |
The paper’s main argument is that Israel’s security policy, which traditionally focused on defending its territorial integrity against regular Arab armed forces, was, by the 2010s, transformed into one that focuses on facing a variety of state- and non-state-based threats. Neo-realist explanations could neither account for the contested nature of the security debate during this period, nor the inconsistent evolution of the policy. The present study aims to solve this conundrum by introducing an alternative approach known as 4th generation strategic culture research. The paper is comprised of four parts. First, the origins and evolution of strategic culture are reviewed, with emphasis placed on the commonly accepted weaknesses that, to date, have prevented it from being used as a testable theoretical concept, and subsequently as an explanatory factor for security policy changes. The second part presents the “modernist constructivism” approach that bridges the gap between traditional constructivism and hypothesis-driven research design. Next, the paper introduces the emerging fourth generation in strategic culture literature, followed by a conceptual framework designed to resolve the inherent weaknesses of the more traditional approaches. Finally, this conceptual framework is applied to analyse the transformation of Israel’s security policy between 1982 and 2014
Argument (complex analysis · Computer security · Conceptual framework · Constructivism (international relations · Critical security studies · Economics · Epistemology · International relations · National security · Network security policy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Security policy · Security studies · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Public Administration
Contested Strategic Cultures
Strategic culture as a (discursive) institution
A machine learning approach to the study of German strategic culture
From Intervention to Retrenchment
Perceived to slack
Tracing strategic preferences in cyberspace
Russian campaign in Syria – change and continuity in strategic culture
Strategic Culture, Domestic Politics, and Foreign Policy
Integrating Strategic Culture and the Operational Code in Foreign Policy Analysis
Historical experiences, strategic culture, and strategic behavior
Overcoming uncertainty in cyberspace
Theory of strategic culture
Rethinking strategic culture
Mapping Continuity and Change in German Strategic Culture, 1999–2022
Security Policy Professionals as Strategic Cultural Agents
From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions
Political and Military Sociology, an Annual Review
The Culture of Military Innovation
Mechanisms and the nature of causation
Realism versus Strategic Culture
Strategic Culture and National Security Policy
Changing Civil–Military Relations in Israel
Time to Move On
What is the context? A reply to the Gray-Johnston debate on strategic culture
Strategic culture as context
Culture Clash
Thinking about Strategic Culture
The Israel Defense Forces as an epistemic authority
Mowing the Grass’
What Happened to Israeli Military Thought
Pounding Their Feet’
The Israel defense forces in the Second Lebanon War
Epilogue
Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes
Mediating International Crises
Conclusion
Fixing the Meaning of 9/11
Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later
What is Controlled by Civilian Control of the Military? Control of the Military vs. Control of Militarization
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 15 |