The coding turn in urban planning
Could it remedy the essential drawbacks of planning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12710285 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nurit Alfasi (0000-0002-0403-1491, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 375-395 |
| Publication date | 2017-07-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Planning Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1473-0952 • E-ISSN: 1741-3052 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1473095217716206 |
| OpenAlex | W2735333831 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 32 |
| References cited | 73 |
The article deals with the growing tendency to articulate planning policies through principles and codes, a feature of recent planning theory and practice. While this tool arouses interest and enthusiasm, very little attention is given to how it affects planning thought and impacts – or should impact – the act of planning and the institutions involved. After reviewing pre-modern decision-making frameworks that accompanied the use of planning codes, this article highlights the role of mutual agreement and shared responsibility in the application of the past planning codes. It then discusses the meaning of the transition to planning codes and elaborates on the opportunity to remedy the embedded pitfalls created by applying comprehensive land-use plans as a regulatory tool, and to institute planning that is based on the principles of liberal democracy
Business · Democracy · Economics · Enthusiasm · Environmental design and planning · Land use · Land-use planning · Management · Management science · Political science · Politics · Process management · Rational planning model · Sociology · Transport engineering · Transportation planning · Urban planning · Engineering · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Psychology · Urban Planning and Governance · Urbanization and City Planning
Self-organizing orders, urban studies and planning theory
The Creeping Conformity—and Potential Risks—of Contemporary Urbanism
Complexity, Responsibility and Care
Planning from Mars, urban design from Venus
Following the process
Coping with collective interests in a self-organised planning regime
Distinguishing ‘planning’ from the ‘plan’. Institutional and professional implications of taking urban complexity seriously
Towards a virtual statecraft
Densification policy between state and market
The spontaneous rules of spontaneous development
Guiding urban self-organization
The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment
Framework rules for self-organizing cities
Spatial-temporal patterns of self-organization
Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations
When flexibility backfires
Planning, law, ownership
Power dynamics and self-organizing urbanism. A comment
Ontological diversity in urban self-organization
The Social Deal
What can urban policies and planning really learn from John Rawls? A multi-strata view of institutional action and a canvas conception of the just city
Antifragile planning
Simple Planning Rules for Complex Urban Problems
Planning and design for long-term neighborhood adaptability
Assessing urban adaptability
National hiking trails
Losing faith in planning
Matching the degree of privateness/collectiveness to the scale of resource use
Action and the city. Emergence, complexity, planning
The city as an information system
Individual motivations, emergent complexity and the just city
The role of social institutions in informal self-organizing urbanism
Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies
Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning
The social goals of new urbanism
Planning and Plan Implementation
Public/Private Development
Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems
Does Planning Work?
Flexibility in Planning and the Consequences for Public-value Capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands
Planning Through Consensus Building
Charter of the New Urbanism
Planning rules for a self-planned city
Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation
Tyranny of the Median and Costly Consent
Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction
Planning, liberty and the rule of law
Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing
After the Plans
Evolving Institutions
Zoning or Discretionary Action
Zoning and Land Use
Into the black hole
Between the rule of law and the quest for control
Compliance of land cover changes with municipal land use planning
The actual impact of comprehensive land-use plans
Urban development agreements
Evaluation of plan implementation in the transitional China
Urban Form in the Arab World
Multi-spot zoning
Planning Just-in-Time versus planning Just-in-Case
Do plans contain urban sprawl? A comparison of Beijing and Taipei
Assessment on the effect of city arable land protection under the implementation of China's National General Land Use Plan (2006–2020)
Success or failure
Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology
The condition of postmodernity
Haussmann and Haussmannisation
Changing Interpretations of 'Flexibility' in the Planning Literature
Does Planning Make a Difference to Urban Form? Recent Evidence from Central Scotland
Planning Arabic Towns
The Entrepreneurial Turn in the Context of a Central State
Deconstructing Communicative Rationality
Urbanization in the Middle East
Spatial Orders in Maya Civic Plans
Site-Planning Principles and Concepts of Directionality among the Ancient Maya
The Planning Monitor
Plan-Led Planning Systems in Development-Led Practices
Planning Policy? Between Long-Term Planning and Zoning Amendments in the Israeli Planning System
| Unique citing works | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 32 |