A new dominant party in India? Putting the 2019 BJP victory into comparative and historical perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12711980 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam Ziegfeld (0000-0002-6857-1286, Political Science, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 136-152 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | India Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1473-6489 • E-ISSN: 1557-3036 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14736489.2020.1744995 |
| OpenAlex | W3028310998 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
The 2019 Indian national election delivered a convincing victory to the BJP and, along with it, prognostications of future BJP election wins. The BJP’s victory was certainly impressive, but does it portend a prolonged period of BJP rule at the national level? As of 2019, any predictions of the BJP’s long-term dominance are premature. The election revealed that the BJP possesses relatively few of the party-system advantages common to other dominant parties, including India’s former dominant party, Congress, during its period of dominance. Whereas a party is ideally situated to become dominant when it is large, enjoys a deep and broad base of support, and faces an opposition that is both fragmented and stigmatized, the BJP’s main advantage lies in its relatively deep support base in its political strongholds. On other dimensions, the BJP has far less in common with other dominant parties
Dominance (genetics · General election · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Victory · Law · South Asian Studies and Conflicts · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |