Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Wollstonecraft and the political value of contempt

Bibliographic Data

ID12717533
AuthorsRoss Carroll (0000-0001-8088-0738, The College of William & Mary, USA, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume18
Issue1
Pages26-46
Publication date2015-07-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Political Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1474-8851 • E-ISSN: 1741-2730
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1474885115593762
OpenAlexW2179669554
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

In her Vindication of the Rights of Men, Mary Wollstonecraft accused Edmund Burke of having contempt for his political opponents. Yet she herself expressed contempt for Burke and did so unapologetically. Readers have long regarded Wollstonecraft’s decision to match Burke’s contempt with one of her own as either a tactical blunder or evidence that she sought merely to ridicule Burke rather than argue with him. I offer an interpretation and defence of Wollstonecraft's rhetorical choices by situating the Vindication within eighteenth-century debates about the dangers of elite contempt and the best methods for stifling it. Rather than countering Burke’s contempt with more of the same, Wollstonecraft’s Vindication marks a distinction between two forms of contempt. The first expresses the false sense of superiority experienced by elites who owe their social elevation to arbitrary differences of wealth or family. As such, it represents both an abuse of privilege and an anxious recognition among elites that their claims to dignity may be unfounded. By contrast, the contempt Wollstonecraft directs at Burke represents a dignified withdrawal of esteem which signals that one’s opponent is unworthy of the dignity to which they lay claim. If Wollstonecraft appeared to treat Burke abusively it was because she came to consider this second form of contempt as an antidote to the abusive contempt of the privileged. I conclude by spelling out some implications of Wollstonecraft’s analysis of contempt for recent debates in political theory over the importance of dignity to democracy

Contempt · Dignity · Oppression · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Privilege (computing · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Value (mathematics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Psychology · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment

  • Mary Wollstonecraft as the “Mother of Human Dignity”

    Open Access•Samuel Harrison•Hypatia•2026

  • A vindication of political virtue

    Virginia Sapiro•A vindication of political virtue•1992

  • Poisoning the Minds of the Lower Orders

    Don Herzog•Poisoning the Minds of the Lower…•2021

  • Hard Feelings

    Macalester Bell•Hard feelings•2013

  • Dignity

    Michael Rosen, Michael J Rosen•Dignity•2012

  • Upward Contempt

    Open Access•William Ian Miller•Political Theory•1995

  • Mary Wollstonecraft, freedom and the enduring power of social domination

    Open Access•Alan Coffee, Alan M S J Coffee•European Journal of Political…•2013

  • Mary Wollstonecraft. A Critical Biography

    Fraser Neiman, Ralph M Wardle•The William and Mary Quarterly•1952

  • Democracy's Dignity

    Open Access•Josiah Ober•American Political Science Review•2012

  • The Idea of Justice

    Open Access•Amartya Kumar Sen, Amartya Sen•Idea of Justice•2009

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae