Human-First, Please
Assessing Citizen Views and Industrial Ambition for Emotional AI in Recommender Systems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12729673 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vian Bakir (0000-0002-6828-8384, Bangor University, corresponding author), Alex Laffer (0000-0003-2463-9135, Bangor University), Andrew Mcstay (0000-0001-8928-3825, Bangor University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 205-222 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Surveillance & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1477-7487 • E-ISSN: 1477-7487 |
| Publisher | Surveillance Studies Network (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.24908/ss.v21i2.16015 |
| OpenAlex | W4383106139 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 26 |
This paper qualitatively explores the views of diverse members of the British public on applications of biometric emotional AI technologies patented by two globally dominant consumer-facing recommender systems, Amazon and Spotify. Examining Amazon and Spotify patents for biometric profiling of users’ emotions, disposition, and behaviour to offer them tailored services, ads, and products from their wider platforms, this paper points to industrial ambition regarding emotional AI. Little is known about ordinary people’s views on deployment of such technology, and given the complex, abstract, and future-facing nature of such technologies, ascertaining informed lay views is hard. We address this through our innovative, qualitative study of diverse British-based adults (n=46) that presents to them near-horizon use cases in an interactive fictional narrative that deploys design fiction principles and ContraVision techniques. We find the themes of “usefulness,” “resignation,” “uneasy terms of engagement,” and “human-first,” adding rich and nuanced insights to prior survey work on users’ views towards biometric-based emotional AI technologies. In contributing to a richer understanding of whether emotional AI technologies should be deployed in consumer-facing recommender systems, and if so, on what terms, we find that well-established policy-friendly criticisms apply to global emotional AI recommender systems. We conclude, however, that problems of alienation and need for a human-first approach to emerging AI technology are the most significant criticisms
Alienation · Biometrics · Data science · Emerging technologies · Internet privacy · Narrative · Political science · Profiling (computer programming · Public engagement · Public relations · Recommender system · Sociology · Software deployment · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Mental Health via Writing · Artificial Intelligence
Emotional AI
Racial disparities in automated speech recognition
My Teacher Is a Machine
How do users interact with algorithm recommender systems? The interaction of users, algorithms, and performance
A new health care system enabled by machine intelligence
Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context
Algorithmic resistance
The Work That Affective Economics Does
Emotional artificial intelligence in children’s toys and devices
Automated Experimentation in Walden 3.0
Surveillance Capitalism
Eavesmining
Surveillance Capital and Post-Fordist Accumulation
The corporate cultivation of digital resignation
The seer and the seen
Amazon
Sociological Practice
Emotional Expressions Reconsidered
Public perceptions of good data management
Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify
When data is capital
Recommendation Systems as Technologies of the Self
Biopolitical platforms
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |