Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Human-First, Please

Assessing Citizen Views and Industrial Ambition for Emotional AI in Recommender Systems

Bibliographic Data

ID12729673
AuthorsVian Bakir (0000-0002-6828-8384, Bangor University, corresponding author), Alex Laffer (0000-0003-2463-9135, Bangor University), Andrew Mcstay (0000-0001-8928-3825, Bangor University)
Year2023
Volume21
Issue2
Pages205-222
Publication date2023-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSurveillance & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1477-7487 • E-ISSN: 1477-7487
PublisherSurveillance Studies Network (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.24908/ss.v21i2.16015
OpenAlexW4383106139
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited26

This paper qualitatively explores the views of diverse members of the British public on applications of biometric emotional AI technologies patented by two globally dominant consumer-facing recommender systems, Amazon and Spotify. Examining Amazon and Spotify patents for biometric profiling of users’ emotions, disposition, and behaviour to offer them tailored services, ads, and products from their wider platforms, this paper points to industrial ambition regarding emotional AI. Little is known about ordinary people’s views on deployment of such technology, and given the complex, abstract, and future-facing nature of such technologies, ascertaining informed lay views is hard. We address this through our innovative, qualitative study of diverse British-based adults (n=46) that presents to them near-horizon use cases in an interactive fictional narrative that deploys design fiction principles and ContraVision techniques. We find the themes of “usefulness,” “resignation,” “uneasy terms of engagement,” and “human-first,” adding rich and nuanced insights to prior survey work on users’ views towards biometric-based emotional AI technologies. In contributing to a richer understanding of whether emotional AI technologies should be deployed in consumer-facing recommender systems, and if so, on what terms, we find that well-established policy-friendly criticisms apply to global emotional AI recommender systems. We conclude, however, that problems of alienation and need for a human-first approach to emerging AI technology are the most significant criticisms

Alienation · Biometrics · Data science · Emerging technologies · Internet privacy · Narrative · Political science · Profiling (computer programming · Public engagement · Public relations · Recommender system · Sociology · Software deployment · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Mental Health via Writing · Artificial Intelligence

  • The state of AI and intellectual property – a thematic scientometric assessment

    Open Access•Gergely Ferenc Lendvai, Peter Mezei et al.•SN Social Sciences•2026

  • Towards the design of user-centric strategy recommendation systems for collaborative Human–AI tasks

    Open Access•Lakshita Dodeja, Pradyumna Tambwekar et al.•International Journal of…•2024

  • ‘Don’t pretend to know how I feel’

    Shuer Zhuo•Behaviour and Information…•2026

  • On manipulation by emotional AI

    Open Access•Vian Bakir, Alex Laffer et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2024

  • Emotional AI

    Andrew Mcstay•Emotional AI•2018

  • Racial disparities in automated speech recognition

    Open Access•Allison Koenecke, Andrew Nam et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • My Teacher Is a Machine

    Jihyun Kim, Kelly Merrill et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • How do users interact with algorithm recommender systems? The interaction of users, algorithms, and performance

    Open Access•Doh Shin•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • A new health care system enabled by machine intelligence

    Open Access•Mahmud Akhter Shareef, Vinod Kumar et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context

    Open Access•Brahim Zarouali, Natali Helberger et al.•Media and Communication•2021

  • Algorithmic resistance

    Open Access•J Velkova, Anne Kaun•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • The Work That Affective Economics Does

    M Andrejevic•Cultural Studies•2011

  • Emotional artificial intelligence in children’s toys and devices

    Open Access•Andrew Mcstay, Gilad Rosner•Big Data & Society•2021

  • Automated Experimentation in Walden 3.0

    Open Access•Martijn van Otterlo•Surveillance & Society•2014

  • Surveillance Capitalism

    Open Access•Shoshana Zuboff, Nina Möllers et al.•Surveillance & Society•2019

  • Eavesmining

    Open Access•Susan Neville, Stephen J Neville•Surveillance & Society•2020

  • Surveillance Capital and Post-Fordist Accumulation

    Open Access•Markus Kienscherf•Surveillance & Society•2022

  • The corporate cultivation of digital resignation

    Open Access•Nora A Draper, Joseph Turow•New Media & Society•2019

  • The seer and the seen

    Open Access•Andrew Iliadis, Amelia Acker•The Information Society•2022

  • Amazon

    Open Access•Emily West•Surveillance & Society•2019

  • Sociological Practice

    Derek Layder•Sociological Practice•1998

  • Emotional Expressions Reconsidered

    Open Access•Lisa Feldman Barrett, Ralph Adolphs et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2019

  • Public perceptions of good data management

    Open Access•Todd K Hartman, Todd Hartman et al.•Big Data & Society•2020

  • Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify

    Open Access•Ignacio Siles, Andrés Segura-Castillo et al.•Big Data & Society•2020

  • When data is capital

    Open Access•Jathan Sadowski•Big Data & Society•2019

  • Recommendation Systems as Technologies of the Self

    Open Access•Nedim Karakayali, Burç Köstem et al.•Theory Culture & Society•2018

  • Biopolitical platforms

    Karen Gregory, J Sadowski•Journal of Cultural Economy•2021

Unique citing works4
Citations per year2
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae