A context-consent meta-framework for designing open (qualitative) data studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12733407 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter Branney (0000-0002-2084-461X, University of Bradford, corresponding author), Kate Reid (0000-0003-2353-3830, University of Glasgow), Nollaig Frost (0000-0001-9296-4824, City, University of London), Susan Coan (0000-0001-5279-8673, Leeds Beckett University), A McL Mathieson (0000-0002-5360-3644, University of Manchester), Maxine Woolhouse (0000-0002-4816-9054, Leeds Beckett University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 483-502 |
| Publication date | 2019-05-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Qualitative Research in Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-0887 • E-ISSN: 1478-0895 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14780887.2019.1605477 |
| OpenAlex | W2942659103 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 19 |
To date, open science, particularly open data, in psychology has focused on quantitative research. This article aims to explore ethical and practical issues encountered by UK-based psychologists utilising open qualitative datasets. Semi-structured telephone interviews with eight qualitative psychologists were explored using a framework analysis. From the findings, we offer a context-consent meta-framework as a resource to help in the design of studies sharing their data and/or studies using open data. We recommend secondary studies conduct archaeologies of context and consent to examine if the data available are suitable for their research questions. This research is the first we know of in the study of “doing” (or not doing) open science, which could be repeated to develop a longitudinal picture or complemented with additional approaches, such as observational studies of how context and consent are negotiated in preregistered studies and open data
Alternative medicine · Context (archaeology · Data science · Data sharing · Engineering ethics · Informed consent · Observational study · Open data · Open Science · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Research ethics · Social science · Sociology · World Wide Web · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Data Analysis and Archiving · Engineering · Medicine · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (Casp) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis
Improving the Credibility of Empirical Legal Research
Re-renderability as an Alternative to Fair
Open qualitative data
Some thoughts on qualitative research in psychology in Europe
Ambitious and driven to scale the barriers to top management
Let us be Clear
Navigating Open Science as Early Career Feminist Researchers
From Policy to Practice
Foxes who want to be hedgehogs
Reflection over compliance
I'm telling you my story, not publishing a blog
Open Science
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
Practising Research
Reworking Qualitative Data
The ‘innocent collection of details’ and journal requests to make qualitative datasets public post-consent
Analytical Pluralism in Qualitative Research
Are you sitting on your qualitative data? Qualidata's mission
Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Parenting in Post-Divorce Estonian Families
Reproducing or constructing? Some questions about transcription in social research
Pluralism in qualitative research
Using the telephone for narrative interviewing
Collecting data from elites and ultra elites
Qualitative Data Archiving
The Data Are Out There, or Are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,71 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |