A Response to the Comments by Boister and McGrady
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12734330 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amir Attaran (University of Ottawa, corresponding author), Roger Bate (0000-0002-8281-4256, American Enterprise Institute), Megan Kendall (0000-0001-6577-2579, University of Ottawa) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 953-957 |
| Publication date | 2011-08-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jicj/mqr037 |
| OpenAlex | W2053198785 |
| Language | EN |
The authors contend Neil Boister's and Benn McGrady's arguments for situating a treaty against the illegal trade in counterfeit medicine under the auspices of the United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNDOC), and update readers on developments, since the publication of their earlier paper proposing the creation of such a treaty, at the World Health Organization (WHO)
Business · Counterfeit · International trade · Political science · Treaty · World trade · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Global Security and Public Health · Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |