Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Litigating Universal Jurisdiction' -- Introduction

Bibliographic Data

ID12734486
AuthorsF Jessberger (corresponding author), Julia Geneuss (0009-0005-3734-9614)
Year2015
Volume13
Issue2
Pages205-208
Publication date2015-03-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jicj/mqv008
OpenAlexW2040857759
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play an important role in the field of international criminal justice. Their influence is evident and multifaceted. Aside from their well known influence on institutional developments, such as the establishment and legal design of the International Criminal Court (ICC), NGOs significantly contributed and still contribute to the progressive development and the universalization of international criminal justice by engaging in a practice that we will refer to as ‘litigating universal jurisdiction’. With this term we denote the strategic use of legal instruments — for example criminal complaints in domestic jurisdictions, amicus curiae briefs, communications to the ICC, applications before international human rights courts, the initiation of complaint proceedings before Committees of the United Nations — in order to promote international criminal justice by drawing attention to impunity in national or international fora and by encouraging litigation in courts or other competent human rights bodies. Important examples of such practice include the well-known ‘Pinochet Saga’, that was initiated by a group of victims, exiles, human rights activists and members of the Spanish Union of Progressive Prosecutors in Spain; the complaints filed in Germany against former United States (US) Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and others for torture and mistreatment of detainees in Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo that, however, did not result in criminal investigations; the equally — at least in legal terms — unsuccessful attempts by several NGOs to trigger criminal investigations against former US President George W. Bush in numerous states; the legal actions of victims, human rights activists and NGOs both, in Guatemala and Spain, that eventually led to the trial of former dictator Efraín Ríos Montt and his then chief of military intelligence in Guatemala — the first time a former head of state has been prosecuted for genocide in a national court; more recently, the prosecution and upcoming trial of former Chadian leader Hissène Habré before the newly established Extraordinary African Chambers in Senegal after many years of NGO lobbying; or the re-opening of the preliminary examination by the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor for alleged war crimes involving systematic detainee abuse by British military officials in Iraq after a German and a United Kingdom based NGO lodged a communication with the ICC

Complaint · Criminal justice · Economic Justice · Genocide · Human rights · Impunity · International law · Jurisdiction · Political science · Torture · Universal jurisdiction · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law

  • Should German Courts Prosecute Syrian International Crimes? Revisiting the “Dual Foundation” Thesis

    Open Access•Yuna Han•Ethics & International Affairs•2022

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae