Enforcing Cooperation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12734774 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Göran Sluiter (University of Amsterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 383-402 |
| Publication date | 2018-03-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jicj/mqy016 |
| OpenAlex | W2894863727 |
| Language | EN |
Non-compliance with requests from the International Criminal Court (ICC) for cooperation — mainly arrest warrants and orders for surrender of persons — appears to be an increasing concern. The author illustrates the cooperation model underlying the ICC Statute and highlights the limitations of what he describes as the ‘harmony approach’ which the drafters had in mind. He then shows a number of perplexing issues in the Court’s case law on non-compliance, and emphasizes distinctions to be made between political, administrative and judicial aspects of non-cooperation proceedings. Finally, he argues in favour of a more robust role for the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) and suggests a system of reactions to non-cooperation which the ASP should adopt
Compliance (psychology · Criminal court · Harmony (color · International law · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Statute · Surrender · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Psychology · Law · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|