Military Criminal Procedures and Judicial Guarantees
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12735192 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roberta Arnold (Combined Arms Academy of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 749-777 |
| Publication date | 2005-05-25 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jicj/mqi021 |
| OpenAlex | W2152148878 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Since the Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials, scant attention has been devoted to military tribunals. Only with the creation of the ICTY and the ICTR has civil society started reconsidering the question of which fora might be better suited for trying individuals responsible for war crimes and other gross human rights violations. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the Swiss military judicial system. It analyses, on the one hand, the judicial guarantees provided for in the Swiss Military Penal Code and the Code of Military Penal Procedure. On the other hand, it discusses the judicial guarantees afforded in the only two war-crimes trials held by the Swiss military justice — the G case and the Niyonteze case — which involved civilians with foreign nationality. Finally, the paper argues against the abolition of military judicial systems
Code (set theory · Criminology · Economic Justice · Human rights · Immigration · International law · Law of war · Military justice · Nationality · Political science · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |