When a Rose is Not a Rose
Military Commissions v. Courts-Martial
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12735559 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R V Meyer (Mississippi College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 48-58 |
| Publication date | 2005-11-24 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jicj/mql098 |
| OpenAlex | W2091584446 |
| Language | EN |
The Military Commissions Act developed a judicial system based upon that of General Courts-Martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The military commissions will use many of the same personnel and share some procedures with general courts-martial, but certain aspects show them to be very dissimilar. Specifically: the revised evidentiary rules on coerced statements, hearsay and classified evidence; the lack of speedy trial rights; the absence of a formal pre-trial investigation; and the failure to apply case law precedent. These differences will have significant secondary effects on the process that are not favourable to a defendant. As a result of both the primary and secondary effects of the differences, the commissions will provide significantly less due process to unlawful combatants than the general court-martial process will provide to their lawful combatant counterparts
Administration (probate law · Combatant · Economic Justice · Hearsay · Martial law · Military justice · Political science · Criminal Law and Evidence · International Law and Aviation · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|