Armed Conflicts and Referrals to the International Criminal Court

From Measuring Impact to Emerging Legal Obligations

Bibliographic Data

ID12735566
AuthorsPhilipp Kastner (0000-0002-7149-6862, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume12
Issue3
Pages471-490
Publication date2014-06-15
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International Criminal Justice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1478-1395 • E-ISSN: 1478-1387
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jicj/mqu036
OpenAlexW2108198945
LanguageEN
Citations received4

This article argues that referring situations to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) with the expectation of generating immediate political effects on ongoing armed conflicts is conceptually flawed. The rationale behind the referrals of the situations in northern Uganda and Darfur illustrates that the common attribution of this capacity to the ICC and the dominant underlying notion of peace — as negative peace — have nurtured a persistent dichotomy between peace and justice. Moreover, by drawing on a socio-legal understanding of law, the article claims that instead of focusing on the assumed promise of international criminal justice institutions to generate specific and measurable political outcomes, it would be more constructive to shift our attention from an elusive outcome- to a process-based analysis, and to view the increasingly frequent involvement of these institutions, not only after a conflict has ended but while it is still ongoing, as an emerging and highly influential process-related commitment

Armed conflict · Attribution · Constructive · Criminal court · Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · International law · Political science · Politics · Process (computing · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Law · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub