American Divide

The Making of “Continental” Philosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID12740773
AuthorsJonathan Strassfeld (0000-0002-0683-3287, University of Rochester, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume17
Issue3
Pages833-866
Publication date2018-12-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Intellectual History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1479-2443 • E-ISSN: 1479-2451
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1479244318000513
OpenAlexW2904275114
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited27

The story of Western philosophy in the late twentieth century is, first and foremost, a tale of the discipline's division into two distinct discourses—analytic and Continental philosophy. This article argues that institutional dynamics of American higher education played a decisive role in the creation of this divide. Through quantitative analysis of the hiring and promotion of philosophers, it demonstrates how hierarchies and informal academic networks established boundaries for mainstream American philosophy that excluded modern European thought. Following the end of World War II, as American universities expanded, philosophy departments nearly tripled in size. However, the discipline was dominated by a Brahmin caste of elite departments that hired its own graduates almost exclusively. In this environment, the invidious distinction between the “elite” analytic departments and heterodox departments at the discipline's periphery was mapped onto the styles of philosophy practiced at those schools, and shaped America's reception of “Continental” European philosophy

American philosophy · Caste · Continental philosophy · Elite · Epistemology · Mainstream · Philosophy education · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess · Social science · Sociology · Western philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy, History, and Historiography · Philosophy, Science, and History · Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub