The Planning Coordination Group
Bureaucratic Casualty in the Cold War Campaign to Exploit Soviet-Bloc Vulnerabilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12747653 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James Marchio (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 3-28 |
| Publication date | 2002-09-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Cold War Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1520-3972 • E-ISSN: 1531-3298 |
| Publisher | The MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/15203970260209491 |
| OpenAlex | W2137364735 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 11 |
The Planning Coordination Group (PCG) was a nondepartmental government organization created in March 1955 by the Eisenhower administration to generate new ideas and coordinate U.S. political warfare activities aimed at exploiting S viet and East European vulnerabilities. The PCG's demise six months later reflected the continuing problems encountered by the new national security bureaucracy in waging political warfare. The PCG's agenda showcased the Eisenhower administration's efforts to attack Communism and secure freedom in a world in which the number and destructiveness of nuclear weapons were gr wing rapidly. At the same time, the PCG's history illustrates that “aggressive” Cold War policies had not been completely dismissed by the Eisenhower administration, a situation that contributed to the “conflicting approaches” strategy it pursued in 1955 and 1956 and the contradictions that adversely affected its policies in Eastern Europe. Finally, this article highlights Dwight Eisenhower's unwillingness to back his rhetorical support for psychological warfare with consistent action
Administration (probate law · Bureaucracy · Cold war · Communism · Demise · Government (linguistics · Nuclear weapon · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · Intelligence, Security, War Strategy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2006 - 2017 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |