Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Young Adults’ Folk Theories of How Social Media Harms Its Users

Bibliographic Data

ID12748980
AuthorsRachel Young (0000-0003-0228-2569, University of Iowa, corresponding author), Volha Kananovich (0000-0001-9208-7489, Appalachian State University), Brett G Johnson (0000-0003-0610-9042, University of Missouri)
Year2021
Volume26
Issue1
Pages23-46
Publication date2021-08-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMass Communication & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1520-5436 • E-ISSN: 1532-7825
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15205436.2021.1970186
OpenAlexW3195472085
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited36

The age of digital, and especially social, media has increased the volume of information users encounter and the mediated interactions users are involved in or observe. This study analyzes young adults’ understanding of harmful content online to identify folk theories, the explanations and predictions users develop to help guide their judgments and behavior. In 494 free responses, college students identified 12 online speech acts or trends as harmful. Subjects primarily identified individuals as the ones harmed, the ones responsible for causing harm, and the ones responsible for solving the problem of harms. Content caused harm through a range of mechanisms, such as normalizing hatred, misinforming citizens, or prompting incessant social comparison. Young adults perceive offensive online speech as a pervasive problem, but with limited personal investment in solutions and little hope for mitigating harm. In decades of research on media effects, there’s been extensive developing and testing of expert theories and less qualitative research on how people make sense of media influence. Our study demonstrates that users’ folk theories are cohesive across a range of content types, focused on the actions and experiences of individual users, and emphasize individual solutions to the large-scale issue of social media effects

Content (measure theory · Harm · Hatred · Internet privacy · Offensive · Political science · Social media · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Folk theories of fake news

    Anastasia Kazun, A D Kazun•Полис Политические исследования•2025

  • Money is the root of all evil.’ How the business of journalism shapes trust in news

    Open Access•Jacob L Nelson, Susan C Lewis et al.•Journalism•2024

  • Young Australians and Online Dating

    Open Access•Chih-Wei Chen, Chih‐Wei Chen et al.•Deviant Behavior•2026

  • Perception of Hate Speech by the Public and Experts

    Open Access•Jana Papcunová, Marcel Martončik et al.•Cyberpsychology Behavior and…•2023

  • ‘If you’re not careful, it can be toxic’

    Open Access•N Chowdhury, Eileen J Rabel et al.•Psychology & Health•2026

  • Reframing ‘vulnerability’ to digital harms

    Open Access•Rohann Irving, Yang Zhao et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Experiencing Political Advertising Through Social Media Logic

    Open Access•Martin Echeverría•Media and Communication•2023

  • Factors Affecting Trust in Chinese Digital Journalism

    Open Access•Shaoqiang Liu, Jinghong Xu et al.•Media and Communication•2023

  • What Is Ethical AI Use in Journalism? Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Ethical Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Usage in Kenyan Newsrooms

    Open Access•Bingbing Zhang, Kevin C Mudavadi et al.•The International Journal of…•2026

  • How finfluencers’ content streaming on social media affects audiences’ investment behavior

    Suraj Velip, Mrunali Jambotkar•Journal of Media Economics•2026

  • Expanding opportunities to maximise research recruitment and data collection using digital tools

    Jennifer Jackson•International Journal of Social…•2022

  • Connected & affected

    Open Access•Baninder Rahi, Abhinav Arohi•International Journal of…•2026

  • The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs

    Open Access•A Hasell, Sedona Chinn•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Hate Crimes in Cyberspace

    Danielle Keats Citron•Hate Crimes in Cyberspace•2014

  • The Theory of Dyadic Morality

    Open Access•Chelsea Schein, Kurt Gray•Personality and Social Psychology…•2018

  • "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]"

    Open Access•Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman et al.•Proceedings of the 33rd Annual…•2015

  • First I "like" it, then I hide it

    Open Access•Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios et al.•Proceedings of the 2016 CHI…•2016

  • Modernity and self-identity

    Anthony Giddens•Modernity and self-identity•1991

  • The psychology of interpersonal relations.

    Fritz Heider•1958

  • The Importance of Context in Moral Judgments

    Open Access•Chelsea Schein•Perspectives on Psychological…•2020

  • Measuring time spent with media

    Vicky Rideout•Journal of Children and Media•2016

  • Media Ethics Theorizing, Reoriented

    Open Access•Patrick Lee Plaisance•Journal of Communication•2016

  • Risk Society

    Ulrich Beck•Encyclopedia of Social Theory•2005

  • Making Sense of Qualitative Data

    Open Access•Matthew Shepherd•Applied Geography•1997

  • Social media addiction

    Open Access•Yubo Hou, Dan Xiong et al.•Cyberpsychology Journal of…•2019

  • Attacks by Anons

    Open Access•Rachel Young, Stephanie Miles et al.•Social Media + Society•2018

  • No Grand Pronouncements Here

    Open Access•Eve Ng•Television & New Media•2020

  • What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint

    Open Access•K Crawford, Tarleton Gillespie•New Media & Society•2014

  • Conceptualizing personal media

    Open Access•Marika Lüders•New Media & Society•2008

  • Alternative citizenship models

    Open Access•Neta Kligler-Vilenchik•New Media & Society•2017

  • Young people and the Internet

    Open Access•Lisa Lee•Young•2005

  • Tolerating and managing extreme speech on social media

    Open Access•Brett G Johnson•Internet Research•2018

  • How Technology Encourages Political Selective Exposure

    Open Access•Ivan B Dylko•Communication Theory•2015

  • Theorising media as practice

    N Couldry•Social Semiotics•2004

  • Lay theories and criticisms of mental health news

    Kate Holland•Disability & Society•2018

  • Understanding how hatred persists

    Carey Mott, Daniel Cockayne•Gender Place & Culture•2020

  • Television and New Media Audiences

    Ellen Seiter, Ellen E Seiter•Television and new media audiences•1998

  • Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research

    John W Creswell, Vicki L Plano Clark•Designing and Conducting Mixed…•2017

  • The Third-Person Effect in Communication

    W Phillips Davison•Public Opinion Quarterly•1983

  • Reconstructing constructivism

    Alison Gopnik, Henry M Wellman•Psychological Bulletin•2012

  • A Tale of Four Platforms

    Open Access•Saleem Alhabash, Mengyan Ma•Social Media + Society•2017

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Lorelli Nowell, Jill M Norris et al.•International Journal of…•2017

Unique citing works13
Citations per year3,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae