Young Adults’ Folk Theories of How Social Media Harms Its Users
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12748980 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rachel Young (0000-0003-0228-2569, University of Iowa, corresponding author), Volha Kananovich (0000-0001-9208-7489, Appalachian State University), Brett G Johnson (0000-0003-0610-9042, University of Missouri) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 23-46 |
| Publication date | 2021-08-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mass Communication & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1520-5436 • E-ISSN: 1532-7825 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15205436.2021.1970186 |
| OpenAlex | W3195472085 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 36 |
The age of digital, and especially social, media has increased the volume of information users encounter and the mediated interactions users are involved in or observe. This study analyzes young adults’ understanding of harmful content online to identify folk theories, the explanations and predictions users develop to help guide their judgments and behavior. In 494 free responses, college students identified 12 online speech acts or trends as harmful. Subjects primarily identified individuals as the ones harmed, the ones responsible for causing harm, and the ones responsible for solving the problem of harms. Content caused harm through a range of mechanisms, such as normalizing hatred, misinforming citizens, or prompting incessant social comparison. Young adults perceive offensive online speech as a pervasive problem, but with limited personal investment in solutions and little hope for mitigating harm. In decades of research on media effects, there’s been extensive developing and testing of expert theories and less qualitative research on how people make sense of media influence. Our study demonstrates that users’ folk theories are cohesive across a range of content types, focused on the actions and experiences of individual users, and emphasize individual solutions to the large-scale issue of social media effects
Content (measure theory · Harm · Hatred · Internet privacy · Offensive · Political science · Social media · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology
Folk theories of fake news
Money is the root of all evil.’ How the business of journalism shapes trust in news
Young Australians and Online Dating
Perception of Hate Speech by the Public and Experts
‘If you’re not careful, it can be toxic’
Reframing ‘vulnerability’ to digital harms
Experiencing Political Advertising Through Social Media Logic
Factors Affecting Trust in Chinese Digital Journalism
What Is Ethical AI Use in Journalism? Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Ethical Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Usage in Kenyan Newsrooms
How finfluencers’ content streaming on social media affects audiences’ investment behavior
Expanding opportunities to maximise research recruitment and data collection using digital tools
Connected & affected
The Political Influence of Lifestyle Influencers? Examining the Relationship Between Aspirational Social Media Use and Anti-Expert Attitudes and Beliefs
Hate Crimes in Cyberspace
The Theory of Dyadic Morality
"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]"
First I "like" it, then I hide it
Modernity and self-identity
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
The Importance of Context in Moral Judgments
Measuring time spent with media
Media Ethics Theorizing, Reoriented
Risk Society
Making Sense of Qualitative Data
Social media addiction
Attacks by Anons
No Grand Pronouncements Here
What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint
Conceptualizing personal media
Alternative citizenship models
Young people and the Internet
Tolerating and managing extreme speech on social media
How Technology Encourages Political Selective Exposure
Theorising media as practice
Lay theories and criticisms of mental health news
Understanding how hatred persists
Television and New Media Audiences
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
The Third-Person Effect in Communication
Reconstructing constructivism
A Tale of Four Platforms
Thematic Analysis
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |