The Paris Agreement as Analogy in Global Environmental Politics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12754338 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas Chan (0000-0002-6018-2833, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 4-11 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-21 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Global Environmental Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1526-3800 • E-ISSN: 1536-0091 |
| Publisher | The MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/glep_a_00622 |
| OpenAlex | W3200466574 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 18 |
The Paris Agreement is increasingly being used as an analogy in global environmental politics to discuss issues beyond climate change. This Forum article explores the two main ways in which this analogy has been discursively employed: as a symbol of diplomatic success to be emulated and as a model for institutional treaty design. It illustrates the broader meanings associated with the Paris Agreement, reflecting its preeminent public and political profile among environmental issues just a few years into its history and its potential significance in shaping subsequent global environmental negotiations
Agreement · Analogy · Environmental politics · Epistemology · Negotiation · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Treaty · Environmental law and policy · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Philosophy · Transboundary Water Resource Management
Analogies at War
Climate Governance at the Crossroads
A Global Deal For Nature
The Montreal Protocol or the Paris Agreement as a Model for a Plastics Treaty
Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss
Multilateralism as an End in Itself1
Moving Forward in the Climate Negotiations
Dangerous Incrementalism of the Paris Agreement
Researching Global Environmental Politics in the 21st Century
Kosovo and the Metaphor War
The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |