How Political Science Shaped Federal Policy in the Biden-Harris Administration
Learning from Efforts to Democratize the Administrative State
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12767973 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexander Hertel‐fernandez (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-21 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592725101928 |
| OpenAlex | W4413335852 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 57 |
The Biden-Harris administration launched two important initiatives to expand public participation in the administrative state. These initiatives aimed to increase public engagement in developing federal regulations and reducing burdens in accessing public benefits. These two initiatives built on social science, especially political science. In this piece, I draw from my experience helping to lead the work to describe how political science research informed the design and implementation of both initiatives. I aim to open the “black box” of how federal policy makers use political science research. I also describe future research that could advance these initiatives. I conclude with a case study of such research, examining the barriers faced by food assistance applicants to sharing their experiences with government with a survey of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) applicants. The survey points to barriers government must overcome to expand participation among SNAP applicants and strategies policy makers might use to do so
Administration (probate law · Policy learning · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Democracy in America?
Unwanted Claims
The Submerged State
Dividing Citizens
The Unheavenly Chorus
Diminished Democracy
Shifting the Color Line
When the State Meets the Street
How Policies Make Citizens
The Relevance of Political Science
Thinking Like an Economist
Uninformed Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It
Fragmented Democracy
Arresting Citizenship
Administrative Burden
Introduction
Healing the Rift between Political Science and Practical Politics
Political Science and Practical Politics
It’s Like Night and Day”
The powers of problem definition
Voice and Equality
A Bias Towards Business? Assessing Interest Group Influence on the U.S. Bureaucracy
Influence and the Administrative Process
When Effect Becomes Cause
Federalism and American Inequality
Policy Feedback and the Politics of Administration
Quota sampling using Facebook advertisements
From the Margins to the Center
How the Scholars Strategy Network Helps Academics Gain Public Influence
Lawyers as Lobbyists
The Fact of Experience
Civic Feedbacks
After the “Master Theory
The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship
It Takes a While to Get Used to
Fragmented Welfare States
The American Political Economy
Studying Leaders and Elites
Setting the Terms of Relief
Too Much Knowledge, Too Little Power
Economists and Societies
I Can't Get Ahold of Them
Fewer Burdens but Greater Inequality? Reevaluating the Safety Net through the Lens of Administrative Burden
What Explains Racial/Ethnic Inequality in Job Quality in the Service Sector
How health navigators legitimize the Affordable Care Act to the uninsured poor
What's to Like? Facebook as a Tool for Survey Data Collection
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |