Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Social Science of Democracy

A Discussion of Alexis de Tocqueville, the First Social Scientist

Bibliographic Data

ID12770917
AuthorsCheryl Alyssa Welch (Harvard University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume9
Issue2
Pages371-374
Publication date2011-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1537592711000387
OpenAlexW2113342777
LanguageEN
References cited4

Alexis de Tocqueville, the First Social Scientist . By Jon Elster. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009. 212p. $80.00 cloth, $22.99 paper. Alexis de Tocqueville is surely one of the most widely cited, discussed, and celebrated political theorists in the world. Jon Elster's book, Alexis de Tocqueville: the First Social Scientist proceeds from a provocative premise: that Tocqueville's major works were lacking in “system” and were “hugely incoherent,” and that Tocqeuville himself “was not a major political thinker” (xi). Elster argues that instead Tocqueville ought to be viewed as a penetrating historical sociologist and an exemplary social scientist who might well be considered the first true social scientist. Elster's argument is important for at least two reasons: first, because it offers a striking and challenging reading of Tocqueville; and second, because it expands on Elster's own contributions in the philosophy of social science, and develops interesting understandings of “causal mechanisms,” methodological individualism, and social explanation more generally. As Elster writes in his Introduction, “the main task of this book is to argue for the relevance of Tocqueville for social science in the twenty-first century (p. 5).” The purpose of this Perspectives symposium is to assess Elster's argument in broad terms. What are the strengths and limits of Elster's reading of Tocqueville? How ought we to assess Elster's understanding of Tocqueville's deficiencies as a “political theorist?” What is the relevance of Tocqueville for contemporary social science? And, most importantly, what are the challenges and possible trajectories facing social science in the twenty-first century, and to what extent does Elster's essay point us in the right direction?—Jeffrey C. Isaac, Editor

Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Premise · Reading (process · Relevance (law · Sociology · Chemistry · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence

  • Ulysses and the Sirens

    Jon Elster•Ulysses and the Sirens•1979

  • Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•American Political Science Review•1991

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae