Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Estimates of Pregnancies Averted Through California's Family Planning Waiver Program in 2002

Bibliographic Data

ID12775360
AuthorsDiana Greene Foster (0000-0002-2741-0283, corresponding author), M Antonia Biggs (0000-0002-3904-3177, Anton Proksch Institut), Gorette Amaral (Amarantus Bioscience (United States)), Claire D Brindis (0000-0002-2284-3936), Sandy Navarro, Mary Bradsberry, Felicia Stewart
Year2006
Volume38
Issue3
Pages126-131
Publication date2006-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1538-6341 • E-ISSN: 1931-2393
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1931-2393.2006.tb00260.x
OpenAlexW4247415035
LanguageEN
References cited6

CONTEXT: During its first year of operation (1997-1998), California's family planning program, Family PACT, helped more than 750,000 clients to avert an estimated 108,000 pregnancies. Given subsequent increases in the numbers of clients served and contraceptive methods offered by the program, updated estimates of its impact on fertility are needed. METHODS: Claims data on contraceptives dispensed were used to estimate the number of pregnancies experienced by women in the program in 2002. Medical record data on methods used prior to enrollment were used to predict client fertility in the absence of the program. Further analyses examined the sensitivity of these estimates to alternative assumptions about contraceptive failure rates, contraceptive continuation and contraceptive use in the absence of program services. RESULTS: Almost 6.4 million woman-months of contraception, provided primarily by oral contraceptives (57%), barrier methods (19%) and the injectable (18%), were dispensed through Family PACT during 2002. As a result, an estimated 205,000 pregnancies—which would have resulted in 79,000 abortions and 94,000 births, including 21,400 births to adolescents—were averted. Changing the base assumptions regarding contraceptive failure rates or method use had relatively small effects on the estimates, whereas assuming that clients would use no contraceptives in the absence of Family PACT nearly tripled the estimate of pregnancies averted. CONCLUSIONS: Because all contraceptive methods substantially reduce the risk of pregnancy, Family PACT'S impact on preventing pregnancy lies primarily in providing contraceptives to women who would otherwise not use any method

Context (archaeology · Developed country · Environmental health · Family medicine · Family planning · Fertility · Geography · Political science · Population · Pregnancy · Program evaluation · Research methodology · Unintended pregnancy · Waiver · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception

  • Unintended Pregnancy in the United States

    Stanley K Henshaw•Family Planning Perspectives•1998

  • Contraceptive Failure, Method-Related Discontinuation and Resumption of Use

    James Trussell, Barbara Vaughan•Family Planning Perspectives•1999

  • Expanded State-Funded Family Planning Services

    Diana Greene Foster, Cynthia M Klaisle et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2004

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae