Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reconciliation between Korea and Japan

Bibliographic Data

ID12779506
AuthorsJon M Van Dyke (University of Hawaii System, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume5
Issue1
Pages215-239
Publication date2006-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueChinese Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1540-1650 • E-ISSN: 1746-9937
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/chinesejil/jml005
OpenAlexW2117944177
LanguageEN
Citations received1

Although Japan and Korea formally normalized their relations in 1965, these neighbours remain wary of each other because of their awkward history during the first half of the twentieth century, when Japan annexed Korea and oppressed the Koreans in many ways.Korean scholars believe strongly that this annexation was "illegal" and that it constituted a violation of international law when it occurred.Japanese scholars tend to admit that the Japanese occupation of Korea was brutal and caused enormous suffering, but they are reluctant to acknowledge that the annexation was "illegal", because other great powers were annexing small countries during that period.The US action supporting the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893 and annexing Hawaii in 1898 may be helpful in finding an appropriate resolution to the Japan-Korea standoff.In 1993, the US Congress enacted a joint resolution formally apologizing to the Native Hawaiian people and calling for a "reconciliation" between the United States and the Native Hawaiians.This resolution acknowledged that the US diplomatic and military support for the 1893 overthrow was "illegal" and was in violation of "international law".This strong statement seems to be an application of "intertemporal law", whereby present views of international law are applied to the events of the 1890s, but, in any event, it is a powerful acknowledgment that a wrong occurred, causing injuries that can still be felt today.The reconciliation process between the United States and Native Hawaiians is now under way and, to be complete, it will require the restoration of the sovereignty of the Native Hawaiians and a return of land and resources to them.Japanese officials have offered apologies to the Koreans, but the reconciliation between the two countries can become complete only if these apologies are accompanied by a transfer of items of real value.This paper proposes that proper payments to the Korean comfort women and a renunciation by Japan of its claim to Dokdo/Takeshima (the tiny islands claimed by both countries) could serve to formalize the reconciliation between these two neighbours

Annexation · Ethnic group · International law · Native Hawaiians · Peace treaty · Political science · Sovereignty · Treaty · Japanese History and Culture · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Law

  • The roles of South Korean cities in politics of memory towards Japan

    Open Access•Natalia Matiaszczyk•Territory Politics Governance•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae