Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kosovo and the Pitfalls of Over-theorizing International Law

Observations on Hilpold's Rejoinder

Bibliographic Data

ID12779802
AuthorsAlexander Orakhelashvili (0000-0003-2921-7169, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume8
Issue3
Pages589-592
Publication date2009-10-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueChinese Journal of International Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1540-1650 • E-ISSN: 1746-9937
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/chinesejil/jmp026
OpenAlexW1986955152
LanguageEN

Peter Hilpold's rejoinder certifies that a debate about the legality of the Kosovo Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) would almost inevitably involve an attempt to reconsider the basic characteristics of the international legal system. This is clear from the example of the attempts to claim the legality of that UDI supported by one part of the international community and opposed by the rest of that community, by over-theorizing international law and thus claiming that the Kosovo UDI could be lawful even though it does not comply with the criteria of legality of the emergence of new States. This approach appears to claim that academic lawyers can project the consensual decisions of States to be substituted by their own perceptions

International law · Political science · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Human Rights and Development · International Law and Human Rights · Law

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae