Keeping Our Honor Clean
A Response to Professor Yoo
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12779996 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin G Davis (0000-0002-5056-407X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 745-750 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Chinese Journal of International Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1540-1650 • E-ISSN: 1746-9937 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/chinesejil/jmi036 |
| OpenAlex | W2017320103 |
| Language | EN |
Avenging himself to excess And slaughtering the guilty, guilty himself became. (Ovid as quoted in Hugo Grotius, De Jure Belle Ac Pacis Libri1) I understand the gist of Professor Yoo's argument is that Articles 4(A)(1) and 4(A)(3) of the Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (“GPW”) are a codification of the prior customary international law that developed since the Brussels Convention of 1874. As a result, the 4(A)(2) definitional criteria (applicable to ‘other’ militias and members of ‘other’ volunteer corps) are to apply implicitly within the Article
Argument (complex analysis · Convention · Honor · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · War, Ethics, and Justification · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |