John Rawls and Policy Formation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12782847 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Gutierrez (0000-0002-6102-8694, University of the Americas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 737-742 |
| Publication date | 2005-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00170.x |
| OpenAlex | W2158897466 |
| Language | EN |
Liberalism has bay far been the most appealing ideology in modern political thought, and considered by many as one of human kind's greatest inventions, product of our development as a race. However, new theories have threatened the philosophical foundations upon which liberalism itself stands. One of the most strongly criticized theories is that of the Original Position , developed by the political philosopher John Rawls, and which is itself a fundamental cornerstone in Rawls's Theory of Justice. In this article, I will focus on discussing the problems and questions that arise for policy formation when analyzing the Orginal Position
Classical liberalism · Cornerstone · Economic Justice · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ideology · Law and economics · Liberalism · Original position · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Positive economics · Product (mathematics · Race (biology · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |