Scientific Fact and Value in U.S. Ocean Dumping Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12782877 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Judith Spiller (University of New Hampshire, corresponding author), ALISON RIESER (University of Maine School of Law) |
| Year | 1986 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 389-398 |
| Publication date | 1986-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Policy Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1541-132X • E-ISSN: 1541-1338 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00706.x |
| OpenAlex | W2064430045 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
Controversy among scientists over appropriate use of the ocean for waste disposal impedes U.S. policy in this area. The problem arises in part because scientific uncertainty over the fate and effects of wastes released into the ocean requires a large element of judgment, and hence value, when the uncertain science is applied to policy. Scientists often supply that judgment and so impose their values, though seldom explicitly, on policy. Further, science often determines policy because many perceive it as an objective basis for decisionmaking and so less subject to the debate that arises from weighing public preferences in policymaking. Thus, scientists' values rather than the public's come to set policy. The resulting policy may elevate one expert's values over another's. Then as values and so interpretation of science shift, policy changes. Or, as in the case now with arguments over the ocean's ability to assimilate many anthropogenic wastes, conflicting science, really conflicting values, results in an agreement and policy inertia. These problems are partially circumvented when scientists make the nonscientific factors behind their reasoning clear. These factors may then be evaluated by the public along with the supporting scientific evidence. Thus, weighing the welfare of society rather than resolving conflicts among scientists becomes the focus of policy
Dumping · Economics · Element (criminal law · Interpretation (philosophy · Microeconomics · Political science · Positive economics · Public economics · Public policy · Science policy · Set (abstract data type · Subject (documents · Value (mathematics · Coastal and Marine Management · Computer Science · Law · Marine and fisheries research · Marine Biology and Ecology Research · Mathematics
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,04 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2002 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |