Heading for Mars While We Haven’t Been on the Moon
A Reply to Nothhaft
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12800677 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Swaran Sandhu (0000-0002-5560-3955, Stuttgart Media University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 184-188 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-10 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Strategic Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1553-118X • E-ISSN: 1553-1198 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1553118x.2017.1319837 |
| OpenAlex | W2613280889 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 10 |
In their rejoinder to Nothhaft’s (2016) call for synthesis and consilience, Christensen and Svensson (2017) discuss three points: (1) Science and progress in strategic communication, (2) Materialism, and (3) Reductionism. Instead of aiming for one all-encompassing framework, this response accentuates creative tension between meta-theoretical positions as a possible way to advance the field. Additionally, more rigor and relevance can by achieved by applying reproducibility studies in the field
Astrobiology · Economics · Geodesy · Haven · Heading (navigation · Mars Exploration Program · Physics · Safe haven · Mathematics · Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs · Philosophy and History of Science · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Geology
| Citations per year | 0.44 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2020 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |