Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Self‐Employed without Employees

Managing Risks in Modern Capitalism

Bibliographic Data

ID12805534
AuthorsFabian Dekker (corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume38
Issue4
Pages765-788
Publication date2010-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1555-5623 • E-ISSN: 1747-1346
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1747-1346.2010.00257.x
OpenAlexW1591514739
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited35

One characteristic of the postindustrial labor market is the rise of the self‐employed worker without personnel. These workers are usually not (fully) included in the welfare system against social risks. Most policy makers as well as social scientists are convinced that these workers want to develop individual risk strategies, for example on the private insurance market. This dominant assumption regarding their risk behavior has, however, not been subjected to empirical research. Through 40 in‐depth interviews with self‐employed workers in the Netherlands, this article examines their risk perception and coping behavior. The main conclusion is that the self‐employed worker does not show the expected individual risk behavior. Exceptional behavior concerns the risk of unemployment. From a policy perspective, the findings suggest that these “new” flexible workers may require collective social guarantees in response to risks. Una característica del mercado laboral de la era post‐industrial es el incremento del trabajador autónomo sin personal bajo su mando. Estos trabajadores no suelen estar (completamente) cubiertos contra riesgos sociales por el sistema de seguridad social. La mayoría de los hacedores de política así como los sociólogos están convencidos que estos trabajadores procurarán estrategias de riesgo individuales, principalmente en el mercado privado de seguros. Sin embargo este supuesto dominante con relación a su comportamiento de riesgo no ha sido objeto de una investigación empírica. A través de 40 entrevistas profundas con trabajadores por cuenta propia en los Países Bajos, este artículo examina sus percepciones de riesgo y su comportamiento para enfrentarlo. La conclusión principal es que el trabajador por cuenta propia no presenta el comportamiento individual de riesgo esperado. Un comportamiento excepcional concierne al riesgo del desempleo. Desde una perspectiva política, las conclusiones sugieren que estos “nuevos” trabajadores flexibles pueden requerir garantías colectivas sociales en respuesta a los riesgos a que están expuestos

Art · Business · Capitalism · Economic growth · Economics · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Social insurance · Sociology · Unemployment · Welfare economics · Employment and Welfare Studies · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Youth Education and Societal Dynamics

  • Situaciones de dependencia económica informal en el trabajo forestal por cuenta propia de La Araucanía

    Open Access•Lincoyan Painecura-Medina•Revista Austral de Ciencias…•2022

  • Precarious self-employment in urban Europe

    Open Access•Darja Reuschke, Mary Zhang•European Urban and Regional Studies•2022

  • Turning post-materialism on its head

    Open Access•Petar Marčeta, Wike Been et al.•Cultural Trends•2023

  • How Do Non‐Standard Work and Labour Market Policy Spending Shape Preferences for Training Versus Unemployment Benefits in Budgetary Trade‐Offs

    Open Access•Young-Kyu Shin, Teemu Kemppainen et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2025

  • Hybrid Areas of Work Between Employment and Self-Employment

    Open Access•Annalisa Murgia, Rossella Bozzon et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2020

  • Farewell to the rightist self-employed? ‘New self-employment’ and political alignments

    Open Access•G Jansen•Acta Politica•2017

  • Precarious Work, Unemployment Benefit Generosity and Universal Basic Income Preferences

    Open Access•Young-Kyu Shin, Teemu Kemppainen et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2021

  • Self-employment as atypical or autonomous work

    Open Access•G Jansen•Socio-Economic Review•2019

  • Conversations with Anthony Giddens

    Anthony Giddens, Christopher Pierson•Conversations with Anthony Giddens•1998

  • Grounding Grounded Theory

    Ian Dey•Grounding grounded theory•1999

  • New Risks, New Welfare

    Peter Taylor-Gooby•New risks, new welfare•2004

  • Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen•Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare•2005

  • Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies

    G Esping-Andersen, Gøsta Esping-Andersen•Social foundations of postindustria…•1999

  • The Self‐Transformation of the European Social Model(s)

    Anton Hemerijck•Why We Need a New Welfare State•2002

  • Why Welfare States Persist

    Clem Brooks, Jeff Manza•Why Welfare States Persist•2007

  • Personality Characteristics of Self-Employed; An Empirical Study

    Open Access•Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, Niels Noorderhaven•Small Business Economics•2005

  • Adapting labour law and social security to the needs of the 'new self-employed' — comparing the UK, Germany and the Netherlands

    Open Access•Karin Schulze Buschoff, Claudia Schmidt•Journal of European Social Policy•2009

  • Welfare-state decommodification in 18 OECD countries

    Open Access•Lyle Scruggs, James Allan et al.•Journal of European Social Policy•2006

  • The New Spirit of Capitalism

    Open Access•Luc Boltanski, Eve Chiapello•International Journal of Politics…•2005

  • Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance

    David B Audretsch, David Audretsch et al.•Regional Studies•2004

  • The inequality of security

    Open Access•Marianne Cooper•Human Relations•2008

  • The empty raincoat

    Open Access•Trevor Williams•Futures•1994

  • Professional Workers in a Risk Society

    Open Access•Carol Ekinsmyth•Transactions of the Institute of…•1999

  • The three worlds of welfare capitalism

    Gøsta Esping-Andersen•The three worlds of welfare…•1990

  • Power Resources and Employer-Centered Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism

    Open Access•Walter Korpi•World Politics•2006

  • Individual motives for contributing to welfare benefits in the Netherlands

    Wim Van Oorschot•Policy & Politics•2002

  • Explaining policy change

    Peter John•Journal of European Public Policy•2006

  • Social risk management through transitional labour markets

    Gunther Schmid•Socio-Economic Review•2006

  • An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Acts of Resistance

    Lawrin Armstrong, Pierre Bourdieu et al.•Labour / Le Travail•1999

  • Bringing the Public Back in

    Paul Burstein•Social Forces•1998

  • Managing Self-management

    Open Access•Michael Gold, Janet Fraser•Work Employment and Society•2002

  • Portfolio Careers' and the Search for Flexibility in Later Life

    Open Access•Kerry Platman•Work Employment and Society•2004

  • Two Paths to Self-Employment

    Open Access•Deborah Carr•Work and Occupations•1996

  • Immigrant Self-Employment

    Open Access•Agnieszka Kanas, Anne Maaike Mulders et al.•Work and Occupations•2009

  • The End of Class Politics? Structural Cleavages and Attitudes to Swedish Welfare Policies

    Open Access•Svallfor, Stefan Svallfor et al.•Acta Sociologica•1995

  • Economic Conditions and Public Attitudes to Welfare Policies

    Morten Blekesaune•European Sociological Review•2007

  • Public Attitudes toward Welfare State Policies

    Morten Blekesaune•European Sociological Review•2003

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,89
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae