Community Research in Other Contexts
Learning from Sustainability Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12807237 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Linda Silka (0000-0003-0729-7102, University of Maine, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 3-11 |
| Publication date | 2010-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1556-2646 • E-ISSN: 1556-2654 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.3 |
| PMID | 21133782 |
| OpenAlex | W2335411174 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 25 |
In health research, community based participatory research (CBPR) has seen remarkable growth as an approach that overcomes many of the ethical concerns raised by traditional approaches. A community of CBPR scholars is now sharing ideas and devising new approaches to collaborative research. Yet, this is occurring in isolation from similar efforts using different nomenclature and occurring outside of health research areas. There is much to be gained by bringing these parallel discussions together. In sustainability science, for example, scholars are struggling with the question of how stakeholders and scientists can coproduce knowledge that offers useful solutions to complex and urgent environmental problems. Like CBPR in health, sustainability science is denigrated for perceived lack of rigor because of its applied problem focus and lack of positivist approach. Approaches to knowledge creation in sustainability science involve "new" ideas such as wicked problems and agent-based modeling, which would be equally applicable to CBPR. Interestingly, sustainability research is motivated less by recognition of the corrosive effects of the inequality of power than from frustration at how limited the impact of research has been, a perspective that might be useful in CBPR, particularly in conjunction with the use of some borrowed tools of sustainability science such as wicked problem analysis and agent-based modeling. Importantly, the example of sustainability science has the potential to keep CBPR from entering into a new orthodoxy of how research should be done
Community engagement · Community-based participatory research · Engineering ethics · Management science · Participatory action research · Political science · Public relations · Social sustainability · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainability science · Community Health and Development · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Integrating Media Studies of Climate Change into Transdisciplinary Research
Handbook of Research Methods for Tourism and Hospitality Management
Using a boundary organization approach to develop a sea level rise and storm surge impact analysis framework for coastal communities in Maine
Added benefits
Dealing with Wicked Problems
Integrating Systems Science and Community-Based Participatory Research to Achieve Health Equity
Decolonizing the Archive
Agent-Based Models
Understanding Wicked Problems
Agent-based modeling
Long-term trends and a sustainability transition
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science
Sustainability Science
Completing the Circle
Evaluating International Collaboration
Faculty Perspectives on Community-Based Research
Introduction to Special Issue
Challenges and Facilitating Factors in Sustaining Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships
Augmenting frameworks for appraising the practices of community-based health interventions
Collaboration and Social Inquiry
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making
Cultural Keystone Species
The Influence of Context on Deliberation and Cooperation in Community-Based Forest Management in Ontario, Canada
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2018 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |