Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Nine Key Functions for a Human Subjects Protection Program for Community-Engaged Research

Points to Consider

Bibliographic Data

ID12807263
AuthorsLainie Friedman Ross (0000-0002-7395-3000, University of Chicago, corresponding author), Allan Loup, Robert M Nelson (0000-0002-7856-555X, California University of Pennsylvania), Jeffrey R Botkin (0000-0002-7897-5153, University of Utah), Rhonda G Kost (0000-0002-5419-0589, Rockefeller University), George R Smith (0000-0002-4073-4979), Sarah Gehlert (0000-0001-6969-9882)
Year2010
Volume5
Issue1
Pages33-47
Publication date2010-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1556-2646 • E-ISSN: 1556-2654
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.33
PMID20235862
PMCIDPMC2963647
OpenAlexW2083992435
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited14

The ethical conduct of Community-Engaged Research (CEnR), of which the Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) model is the partnership model most widely discussed in the CEnR literature and is the primary model we draw upon in this discussion, requires an integrated and comprehensive human subjects protection (HSP) program that addresses the additional concerns salient to CEnR where members of a community are both research partners and participants. As delineated in the federal regulations, the backbone of a HSP program is the fulfillment of nine functions: (1) minimize risks; (2) reasonable benefit-risk ratio; (3) fair subject selection; (4) adequate monitoring; (5) informed consent; (6) privacy and confidentiality; (7) conflicts of interest; (8) address vulnerabilities; and (9) HSP training. The federal regulations, however, do not consider the risks and harms that may occur to groups, and these risks have not traditionally been included in the benefit: risk analysis nor have they been incorporated into an HSP framework. We explore additional HSP issues raised by CEnR within these nine ethical functions. Various entities exist that can provide HSP---the investigator, the Institutional Review Board, the Conflict of Interest Committee, the Research Ethics Consultation program, the Research Subject Advocacy program, the Data and Safety Monitoring Plan, and the Community Advisory Board. Protection is best achieved if these entities are coordinated to ensure that no gaps exist, to minimize unnecessary redundancy, and to provide checks and balances between the different entities of HSP and the nine functions that they must realize. The document is structured to provide a "points-to-consider" roadmap for HSP entities to help them adequately address the nine key functions necessary to provide adequate protection of individuals and communities in CEnR

Business · Computer security · Confidentiality · Engineering ethics · General partnership · Informed consent · Institutional review board · Political science · Public relations · Research ethics · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Health Policy Implementation Science · Law · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology

  • Aligning clinical research ethics with community-engaged and participatory research in the United States

    Open Access•Milton Eder•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Engaging Communities to Strengthen Research Ethics in Low‐Income Settings

    Open Access•Dorcas Kamuya, Dorcas M Kamuya et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2013

  • The Research Ethics Committee is Not the Enemy

    Open Access•Leslie E Wolf•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2010

  • Community Partnered Research Ethics Training in Practice

    Open Access•Michael Yonas, Maria Catrina D Jaime et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2016

  • Are We Asking the Right Questions? A Review of Canadian REB Practices in Relation to Community-Based Participatory Research

    Open Access•Adrian Guta, M Glen Wilson et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2010

  • Ethics Review for a Multi-Site Project Involving Tribal Nations in the Northern Plains

    Open Access•Jyoti Angal, Julie M Petersen et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2016

  • Research Ethics Education for Community-Engaged Research

    Open Access•Emily E Anderson, Stephanie Solomon et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2012

  • Community-Based Participatory Research, Ethics, and Institutional Review Boards

    Open Access•Jennifer E Cro, Kathleen Pickering et al.•Critical Sociology•2014

  • Commentary

    Open Access•Audrey Mengwasser Shillington, Sarah Gehlert et al.•Journal of the Society for Social…•2020

  • Dogs on Call”

    Open Access•Lisa Townsend, Nyssa Towsley et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2023

  • Evaluating Community Engagement in Research

    Open Access•Melody S Goodman, Vetta L Sanders Thompson et al.•Journal of Community Psychology•2017

  • Comparative Effectiveness of a Faith-Based HIV Intervention for African American Women

    Gina M Wingood, LaShun R Robinson et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2013

  • Why are African Americans under‐represented in medical research studies? Impediments to participation

    Vickie L Shavers‐Hornaday, Charles F Lynch et al.•Ethnicity and Health•1997

  • U.S. Research Universities' Institutional Conflict of Interest Policies

    Open Access•Sheila Slaughter, Mitchell Feldman et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2009

  • The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-Appointed Representatives

    Laura Montanaro•The Journal of Politics•2012

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2010 - 2023 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae