Comparing Lay Community and Academic Survey Center Interviewers in Conducting Household Interviews in Latino Communities

Bibliographic Data

ID12808603
AuthorsAlec M Chan‐Golston (0000-0001-9963-8650, University of California, Los Angeles, corresponding author), Scott Friedlander (0000-0002-1164-8940, University of California, Los Angeles), Deborah Glik (0000-0002-2532-3661, University of California, Los Angeles), Michael Prelip (University of California, Los Angeles), Thomas R Belin (0000-0003-4283-2676, University of California, Los Angeles), Ron Brookmeyer (0000-0002-8639-3399, University of California, Los Angeles), Robert Santos (0000-0002-5752-5129, Urban Institute), Jie Chen (0000-0002-9254-4413), Alexander N Ortega (0000-0001-6861-6993, University of California, Los Angeles)
Year2016
Volume10
Issue3
Pages435-442
Publication date2016-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueProgress in community health partnerships (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1557-055X • E-ISSN: 1557-0541
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/cpr.2016.0050
PMID28230551
OpenAlexW2550604900
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

With a lower cost per completed survey and lower item nonresponse rates, lay community interviewers are a viable alternative to professional interviewers for fieldwork in community-based research. Additional research is needed to assess other important aspects of data quality interviewer such as interviewer effects and response error

Academic community · Center (category theory · Medical education · Sociology · Survey research · Unit (ring theory · Applied Psychology · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access