Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mulch Madness

A Community–Academic Partnership for Lead Poisoning Prevention

Bibliographic Data

ID12809276
AuthorsKyle J Moon (0000-0003-0655-0583, corresponding author), Lauren N Bauman, Meghanne Tighe (0000-0002-8930-892X), J Mike Coman, Kathy Schuth, Cheryl Walsh, Heidi Beidinger‐Burnett, Matthew Sisk (0000-0002-4141-9655), Marya Lieberman (0000-0003-3968-8044)
Year2024
Volume18
Issue2
Pages141-153
Publication date2024-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueProgress in community health partnerships (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1557-055X • E-ISSN: 1557-0541
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/cpr.2024.a930711
OpenAlexW4400125644
LanguageEN

Background: Soil constitutes a major source of childhood lead exposure, disproportionately affecting communities of color. Mulching offers a low-cost interim control. Objectives: A community–academic partnership was established for lead poisoning prevention, with a three-fold aim: (1) control soil lead hazards by applying mulch, (2) identify home lead hazards with screening kits, and (3) connect residents to resources to address lead hazards. Methods: Student volunteers canvassed neighborhoods one month prior to the annual event. They requested consent for mulching, distributed lead screening kits, and screened residents for grant eligibility. Soil samples were collected from each home before mulching. According to principles of community-based participatory research, materials and plans were iterative, guided and adjusted by neighborhood association feedback, and detailed reports about home lead results were shared with each participating resident. Composite neighborhood data and survey results were shared with volunteers and community partners. Results: The project was evaluated in the third (41 homes) and fourth (48 homes) years of implementation. Before mulching, the median soil lead level was over 400 ppm, and after mulching, it was less than 20 ppm. Lead screening kits identified widespread lead hazards in paint, soil, and dust, but not water. Challenges remain in (a) increasing child blood lead testing and (b) increasing submissions for city grant funding for lead abatement. Evaluation surveys indicate a sense of ownership in the project among community partners and high levels of engagement among students. Conclusions: Community–academic partnerships are an effective tool for lead poisoning prevention, generating evidence for public health action

Business · Community-based participatory research · Environmental health · General partnership · Interim · Lead poisoning · Mulch · Participatory action research · Political science · Sociology · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity · Medicine

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae