Alternatives to the IAEA
Greenpeace and Japanese Municipalities Measure Radiation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12810880 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dougal Mcneill (0000-0003-0049-1770, corresponding author), David Mcneill (0000-0002-6892-5902, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 54 |
| Publication date | 2012-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Japan focus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1557-4660 • E-ISSN: 1557-4660 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1557466012016282 |
| OpenAlex | W4410182326 |
| Language | EN |
On June 8, the Wall Street Journal reported that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which promotes itself as “the world's center of cooperation in the nuclear field”, has come under fire for its handling of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi crisis. NGOs accuse them of whitewashing, while officials from G8 countries have expressed concerns that the IAEA has been slow in providing clear information about the Fukushima radiation release and the situation at the Daiichi plant. The organization is also accused of not being sufficiently critical of the Japanese government
Business · Database · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Geography · Measure (data warehouse · Political science · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Radioactive contamination and transfer
| Highly cited | No |
|---|