Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Estates and Razdatok (clarifying the definition of estates)

Bibliographic Data

ID12819442
AuthorsР Р Вахитов (0000-0001-9161-0899, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume23
Issue4
Pages121-138
Publication date2017-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1562-2495 • E-ISSN: 1684-1581
PublisherFederal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.19181/socjour.2017.23.4.5532
OpenAlexW2779034174
LanguageEN

Modern sciences about society, including sociology, consider estates to be something that belongs to the archaic traditional world. However, S.G. Kordonsky’s theory of estates argues that, on the contrary, estates still exist in modern societies. They are the groups which are granted various privileges by the state. Critics of Kordonsky’s theory say that it mistakenly likens estates to professional groups given special authority by the law (like police officers, administrators). Тhe author argues that Kordonsky’s understanding of estates is more complex and involves the connection of a class society with a certain form of economic distribution (razdatok). Razdatok is a form of management alternative to a market, based on the surrendering of material goods to the state and the distribution of them among social groups (O.E. Bessonova), as well as a state’s authoritarian and ideocratic nature. This article describes how such distribution forms the state officials and the merchant class, while indicating how members of such classes differ from professional managers (Weberian “rational bureaucrats”) which exist in a society of market and classes.The article also describes the main estates in Russian society during its various historical stages: prerevolutionary (nobility, clergy bureaucracy, industrialists, peasantry, petty bourgeoisie, workers), Soviet (Party elite (“nomenclature”), party ideologues and propagandists, teachers, engineers, loyal creative intellectuals, workers, soviet peasants (members of “kolkhoz”), technical personnel) and post-Soviet (“service oligarchs”, employees of security services (“siloviki”), “state employees”, “people”).In conclusion, considered is such an issue as the reasons for the reproduction of Russian society’s class structure, despite several waves of modernization. The most important reason is a lower intensity of resources in an estate-based society, in contrast to a democratic class society with a ramified bureaucratic apparatus

History · Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae