Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Theoretical Approaches towards Studying the Transformation of the Family Institution

Bibliographic Data

ID12819504
AuthorsTatiana A Gurko (0000-0003-3804-0924, Institute of Sociology, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume26
Issue1
Pages31-54
Publication date2020-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1562-2495 • E-ISSN: 1684-1581
PublisherFederal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.19181/socjour.2020.26.1.7052
OpenAlexW3013596308
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited26

The transformation of the institutions of marriage, family and parenthood in recent decades in the context of rapid social, economic, cultural and technological innovations worldwide encourages theorists to look for explanations of the nature and direction of the processes that are taking place. American sociologists of the family Stan Knapp and Greg Wurm present a rather promising systematization of the theoretical approaches to changes in the institution of the family. The criteria of approaches according to the authors’ typology: relationality – vertical / horizontal, and dimensionality – single / multidimensional. This article’s purpose is to reflect on this typology so that Russian researchers go beyond theorizing in the framework of “opposing paradigms of crisis – modernization of the institution of family” disputes, which are more ideological than scientific. The institutional approach is widely represented in the works of classics of foreign and Russian sociology of the family. The classic institutional approach is expanded upon by the works of representatives of the new institutional approach. In the approach of deinstitutionalization, the main emphasis is placed on increasing individual needs, with “family” being a “pure relationship”. The diversification approach, which was mentioned among others by the author of this very article in the mid-1990’s, seems to be the most constructive from an empirical point of view. The article shows the diversification of the family institution, the spread of new family structures in many countries with references to empirical studies and statistical sources. Knapp and Wurm, the authors of the presented typology, consider the approach of institutional logic in relation to the family to be promising. The main problems of its application are discussed in article. The application of the classical theory of family development, as it was formulated in the 20th century when normative family paths were dominant, is also problematized, together with the lack of Russian longitudinal studies and works that describe modern family life paths. What western sociologists agree on, and what the analysis of Russian studies confirms, are the differences in the models of organizing private life in different social groups, at least among educated and uneducated citizens. Analysis of trends in the prevalence of alternative forms of family life in different social groups allows us to assess the nature of changes in the institutions of marriage and family, either as evolutionary or transformational

Constructive · Context (archaeology · Diversification (marketing strategy · Economics · Epistemology · Ideology · Institution · Modernization theory · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Restructuring · Social science · Sociology · Terminology · Typology · Anthropology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · History · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law

  • Domestic violence as a social problem in the Russian society

    Open Access•Sergey D Savin, Vladislav Shchepelkov et al.•RUDN Journal of Sociology•2025

  • The role of family in children's well-being

    Open Access•Т О Гордеева, Oleg Sychev et al.•Social Psychology and Society•2026

  • The Community of Parents of Schoolchildren as a Subject of Civil Society (based on Materials from a Study conducted in a Russian Megalopolis)

    Open Access•G E Zborovsky, Н В Шаброва•Sociological Journal•2021

  • Recent Trends of Marriage in Iran

    Open Access•Akbar Aghajanian, Sajede Vaezzade et al.•The Open Family Studies Journal•2018

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM)

    Open Access•Barry Turner•The Statesman's Yearbook 2007•2006

  • Theorizing Family Change

    Open Access•Stan J Knapp, Greg J Wurm et al.•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2019

  • Outline of Family and Civilization

    Carle C Zimmerman•Marriage and Family Living•1947

  • Family Development Theory 30 Years Later

    Open Access•Todd F Martin•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2018

  • Revolution in Intimate Life and Relationships

    Open Access•Stephanie Coontz•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2015

  • Is Marriage Individualized? What Couples Actually Do

    Open Access•Carrie Yodanis, Lauer•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2014

  • Fictive Kin, Families We Choose, and Voluntary Kin

    Open Access•M K Nelson•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2013

  • Family and marriage

    Open Access•Alexander B Sinelnikov•Sociological Journal•2018

  • Institutional Logic”

    Open Access•Irina Shmerlina•Sociological Journal•2016

  • The family

    K Cook•Journal of Family Studies•2014

  • Reflexivity over and above convention

    Open Access•Michael Gilding•British Journal of Sociology•2010

  • Degrees of Change

    Open Access•Andrew J Cherlin•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2020

  • Marital Monogamy as Ideal and Practice

    Open Access•Adam Isaiah Green, Jenna Valleriani et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2016

  • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Families

    Open Access•Timothy J Biblarz, Evren Savcı et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2010

  • Single Mothers "Do" Family

    Open Access•M K Nelson•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2006

  • Tension between institutional and individual views of marriage

    Open Access•Paul R Amato•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2004

  • The institutional logics of love

    Open Access•Roger Friedland, John W Mohr et al.•Theory and Society•2014

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae